israel4ever

Oooooh! Nice shot, Steff.

Didn't we inqure about Randy Winn during last offseason?

Now who's crying?!

You need to stop giving me crap, when it's unwarranted. Peace.

The original question was" why do we need Beltran if we have Sweeney and Anderson?". I answered, because it's better to have a proven superstar than prospects. What's the f***ing problem with what I said, Steff?

This would be funny, if it weren't so sad (but true).

That's what I said above, if you take the time to read it.

Out of respect for you, Steff, and the other posters, I will refrain from adressing Jim until he proves that he is mature/intelligent enough to have a discussion on the issues. I apologize to you all.

The point is, IN GENERAL, it's better to have a proven superstar than it is to have/rely on prospects.

I guarantee that there are more "can't-miss" prospects that "missed" than there are thant were successful big leaguers.

Jon Rausch? Kip Wells? Bobby Hill? There are thi=osands of "can't -miss" prospects who missed. There are a lot more that missed then made it!

To answer your question, in general, you should ALWAYS take a proven superstar over prospects. Prospects hardly ever pan out. Don't worry though, Beltran will play CF here when JR makes Boras his GM.

I am not overly optimistic on Everett's future as a Chisox...are you?

That was a compliment, Steff. He finally wrote something worth reading, and I commended him for it.

Congratulations Jim...this was the first intelligent posting you've made. I guess even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in awhile.