Jump to content

clyons

Members
  • Posts

    3,096
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by clyons

  1. QUOTE (JohnCangelosi @ Sep 23, 2008 -> 08:59 PM)
    After not even competing in this game, it's a two game series. Scott Baker 6 STRONG as expected and will probably go through this lineup easily for 2 more innings, saving the Twins BP. Expect more of the same NO MATTER WHO they throw out there tomorrow.

     

    Now, who believes the Whitesox can split a two game series in the dome WHEN THE GAMES COUNT?

     

    I don't. Season over.

    And you are . . . .?

     

    Why the hell not. All the games count.

  2. QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 23, 2008 -> 08:54 PM)
    Funny stuff, but he is around this team every day. He's said nothing about this team being amped up to play. Rather, he continues to say how the Twins are catching us at the right time.

    I know, but what can you really say during a game like this? This is baseball, not football. "Amped up" means nothing. And a butt kicking today means nothing tomorrow.

  3. QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 23, 2008 -> 08:48 PM)
    I disagreed earlier when you said it was over, but I completely agree that judging by Hawk, a Twins sweep is inevitable.

    Yes, of course. Hawk is old and omnicient and judging by him is the key to life. So, I've decided that not only is a sweep inevitable, but I should marry a Greek woman, move our best catcher to the outfield, and pray to the god of Yazstremski.

  4. QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 12:32 PM)
    I just wanted to say that I love the Western Amateur. Go every year.

     

    Way to support the Western Golf Association. Its a shame the Western Open is no more, but the "BMW Classic" should be back at Cog Hill on a regular basis next year.

     

    Looks like the Euros came to play today, and this will be a match through tomorrow. Hopefully, the US will hold on without Tiger, as the Sox will do w/o CQ.

  5. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 10:22 AM)
    Awww hell naw!

     

    Who cares if I typed in ebonics? It wasn't meant as a jab.

     

    That's fine. It wasn't the verb per se, but its seeming connection to Charles Rangel that gave me pause. I certainly wasn't leveling any accusation. I hope we "be" cool. :)

  6. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 08:23 AM)
    Oh goodness now that's quite the stretch. You owe the world an apology after that post.

     

    "That s*** be taxable" seemed like Eubonics to me, and I don't think that's cool. If it wasn't, then I apologize to you and the world for registering concern that some might be offended as politely and respectfully as possible.

  7. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 12:40 AM)
    OMG.

     

    Rental income is taxable? Anyone been to Blockbuster lately? No SH*T that sh*t be taxable!

     

    I don't want to come off as all hyper-pc, but with all due respect, using "be" as a verb in that context doesn't seem too cool.

×
×
  • Create New...