August 30, 200421 yr In exchange for arranging meets for Chinese nationals with the SEC. http://www.judicialwatch.org/3800.shtml
August 30, 200421 yr shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... the media can never know this! Oh wait, even if they do, they won't report it.
August 30, 200421 yr Author shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... the media can never know this! Oh wait, even if they do, they won't report it. These reports have been around forever. Basically when they connected Clinton with Chung, they knew who else had taken money, Kerry being one of them. The information about Kerry setting them up in front of the SEC came about a little later.
August 30, 200421 yr Judicial Watch is good people. They're the ones that sued Cheney for his Energy documents when he had that meeting with big members of Enron etc. to decide Energy policy. After they won the court case, Cheney appealed and lost again. Then he put the documents under the vast blanket of "executive privilege". Only problem is the idea of a polygraph test to determine if this guy is telling the truth? In 1997, an FBI agent by the name of Drew Richardson who had dealt with polygraphs for 25 years as an agent. He stated under oath in the Senate Judiciary Committee about using polygraphs to question people in sensitive positions: "It is completely without any theoretical foundation and has absolutely no validity. Although there is disagreement among scientists about the use of polygraph testing in criminal matters, there is almost universal agreement that polygraph screening is completely invalid and should be stopped. As one of my colleagues frequently says, the diagnostic value of this type of testing is no more than that of astrology or tea-leaf reading. If the test had any validity, which it does not, both my own experience and published scientific research has proven that anyone can be taught to beat this type of polygraph exam in a few minutes." Needless to say he was told not to speak on the topic again and the FBI has refused him from speaking about it. I didn't wanna threadjack but just found that was really interesting about polygraph testing. As for this Kerry thing...it wouldn't surprise me at all if these claims are substantiated. Remember, the media is there to debate Kerry's hair, not make investigate breakthroughs like they did with the Pentagon Papers (back when the media had balls)
August 30, 200421 yr Author ROTFLMAO Apu, your sig. That is excellent. Thank god he is sticking to the debate
August 30, 200421 yr ROTFLMAO Apu, your sig. I'd be interested to find out just how many people will find this site based on the keywords in Apu's signature. That is hilarious.
August 30, 200421 yr Someone is running away with the lead in the Fight of The Week Thread for SST. It might be clear about this one.
August 30, 200421 yr Which politician hasn't accepted illegal donations. Even my guy W has on numerous occasions I'm sure
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.