Sounds like he might testify at Saddam's trial, and name names in the food for oil scandal.

 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6729467/

This could be huge if what he says turns out to be true. Even though I'm still wary of believing him, though he now has no real reason to lie because he would be screwed either way.

The problem with keeping only "yes" men, is that at their core, they'll say "yes" to anyone who's buttering their bread.