February 24, 200521 yr This is one hell of a funny site!!! http://ned.ucam.org/~sdh31/misc/destroy.html
February 24, 200521 yr lol Comments: My good friend Rob rightly informs me that this course of action does not strictly speaking "destroy" the Earth - there is no actual destruction event in which the Earth goes from existing to not existing. What one ends up with instead is a universe in which the Earth does not and never did exist. Destroying Rob proved remarkably easy.
February 24, 200521 yr QUOTE(Texsox @ Feb 24, 2005 -> 12:35 PM) LOL following this link That is awesome too
February 24, 200521 yr Now I can live by those rules...I always wanted to be an Evil Overlord...man someone has wayyyy too much time on their hands.
February 24, 200521 yr Author QUOTE(Texsox @ Feb 24, 2005 -> 12:35 PM) LOL following this link LOL!!! I just printed that page out and am giving it to my boss who will get much of the "inside" humor! That is brilliant!
February 24, 200521 yr Author QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Feb 24, 2005 -> 12:52 PM) Now I can live by those rules...I always wanted to be an Evil Overlord...man someone has wayyyy too much time on their hands. And I am sooooooo thankful that they do have too much time!!! LOL!!!
February 24, 200521 yr Author Just saw this part: Things which will NOT destroy the Earth Armageddon, as described in the Bible. Fieari writes, "Armageddon does not destroy the Earth, nor even everyone on it. One third of the human population is wiped out repeatedly (at least one third of one third) but then not only does the remnant survive, but God's people return from heaven and get to live in a city roughly the size of half the [united States - thanks Dave Babbitt for this correction]. This is as far from your definition of "destroying the Earth" as you can reasonably get, as the planet is still there AND people still live on it." Paradoxes as described in Back To The Future Part II. By definition, a paradox cannot actually come into existence. Ceasing all thought (if the Earth is not observed, then how can it exist?). Philip K. Dick said it best: "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Detonating all the nuclear weapons ever created simultaneously, either all at one location or strategically placed around the globe. This will irradiate pretty much the entire globe and cause a nuclear winter but will actually destroy very little of the planet itself. Proving that 1=0. If one did indeed equal zero, so it is reasoned, then since there is one Earth, there must be zero Earths... so, if one could prove it, the Earth would cease to exist. This is specious logic. Finding a proof in mathematics does not magically change a fact from being false to being true. It merely verifies rigorously as true a fact that always was true. Thus, if 1=0 could be proved, then it would always have been true and the Earth should never have existed. But Earth is still here. QED. Runaway fission at the Earth's core, as proposed by Tom Chalko. There is no fission going on at the Earth's core. Besides which, if a nuclear explosion did occur at the core, it would be insulated from the surface by sixty-three hundred kilometres of liquid iron. Thanks to Rudy Hasspacher for bringing this entertaining piece of crackpottery to my attention. Gay marriage.
February 25, 200521 yr An excellent, excellent site! And of course the the only thing we know that most certainly would destroy the earth is.... A Vogon superspace highway. Edited February 25, 200521 yr by FlaSoxxJim
February 25, 200521 yr QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Feb 24, 2005 -> 07:50 PM) An excellent, excellent site! And of course the the only thing we know that most certainly would destroy the earth is.... A Vogon superspace highway. Or an Irudium PU 36 explosive space modulator.
February 25, 200521 yr QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Feb 25, 2005 -> 12:25 AM) Or an Irudium PU 36 explosive space modulator. Marvin Rocks.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.