April 18, 200521 yr like how many quality starts a team has or tough losses or cheap wins etc etc etc
April 18, 200521 yr I don't think there's a such statistic as a "tough loss;" however, you might wanna try asking JUGGERNAUT with regards to things such as quality starts. JUGGERNAUT seems to be the king of statistics here at Soxtalk.
April 18, 200521 yr QUOTE(Reddy @ Apr 17, 2005 -> 09:27 PM) like how many quality starts a team has or tough losses or cheap wins etc etc etc I do know off the top of my head that a quality start as definied by MLB is considered 6 IP with 3 ER or less. As it works out, 50% of starts by pitchers are quality starts and a team that gets a quality start from a pitcher tends to win 66% of the time that occurs.
April 18, 200521 yr QUOTE(Reddy @ Apr 17, 2005 -> 10:27 PM) like how many quality starts a team has or tough losses or cheap wins etc etc etc Sox have 8 which lead all of baseball i believe. Might be someone tied with them. QUOTE(BridgeportHeather @ Apr 17, 2005 -> 10:37 PM) JUGGERNAUT seems to be the king of statistics here at Soxtalk. If you say so. QUOTE(Wedge @ Apr 17, 2005 -> 11:59 PM) I do know off the top of my head that a quality start as definied by MLB is considered 6 IP with 3 ER or less. As it works out, 50% of starts by pitchers are quality starts and a team that gets a quality start from a pitcher tends to win 66% of the time that occurs. I still will never understand why a 4.50 era is considered ''quality''.
April 18, 200521 yr QUOTE(qwerty @ Apr 17, 2005 -> 11:32 PM) I still will never understand why a 4.50 era is considered ''quality''. Because your bullpen should be able to take care of business and your offense should be able to put up 4 runs.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.