May 15, 200817 yr I believe superstition and tradition dictates we continue the positive game thread.
May 15, 200817 yr AJP-CQ-JD batting 2-3-4....yesssssss OCab coming around at the plate....yesssssss Vasquez better than Garland...yessssssss Thome getting 4 hits (2 HRs) today causing Ozzie to consider "trying him at 1B" tomorrow to keep it going...hmmmmm Swisher getting on base with BBs if not hits.....I hope so
May 15, 200817 yr QUOTE (heirdog @ May 15, 2008 -> 08:06 AM) AJP-CQ-JD batting 2-3-4....yesssssss OCab coming around at the plate....yesssssss Vasquez better than Garland...yessssssss Thome getting 4 hits (2 HRs) today causing Ozzie to consider "trying him at 1B" tomorrow to keep it going...hmmmmm Swisher getting on base with BBs if not hits.....I hope so also leading the league in fielding percentage at SS
May 16, 200817 yr QUOTE (Texsox @ May 15, 2008 -> 10:09 PM) When you are old and have a job, west coast games suck. When you're old and have a job, most things suck.
May 16, 200817 yr Positive Game Thread 2-0 baby! I'm really happy to be .500 heading into San Fran. We should take at least 2 of 3, I mean it's basically us against Aaron Rowand out there right?
May 16, 200817 yr QUOTE (joesaiditstrue @ May 16, 2008 -> 01:28 AM) Javy lowers his ERA by ~3%! lol seriously though, we need to destroy the giants. We are missing lincecum. A sweep would be a good step.
May 16, 200817 yr QUOTE (rangercal @ May 15, 2008 -> 11:50 PM) We are missing lincecum. A sweep would be a good step. We still have to see Cain. And that isn't much easier.
May 16, 200817 yr QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ May 16, 2008 -> 01:52 AM) We still have to see Cain. And that isn't much easier. no doubt that cain has some great stuff. But, Lincecum's ERA is about 2.3 runs better. I can see your point though if you take out the 9 er STL game from Cain's 2008 resume. Edited May 16, 200817 yr by rangercal
May 16, 200817 yr QUOTE (rangercal @ May 16, 2008 -> 12:03 AM) no doubt that cain has some great stuff. But, Lincecum's ERA is about 2.3 runs better. I can see your point though if you take out the 9 er STL game from Cain's 2008 resume. There is no doubt Lincecum is better, or at least performing better, but people who have yet to see Cain are going to be in for a surprise if they think it's going to be easy win.
May 16, 200817 yr QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ May 16, 2008 -> 01:20 AM) There is no doubt Lincecum is better, or at least performing better, but people who have yet to see Cain are going to be in for a surprise if they think it's going to be easy win. There is no easy win with this offense when it takes naps against any random pitcher, but I don't think Cain is really that good. Terrible GO/AO ratio, mediocre WHIP, and not a fantastic K/9 to make up for it like Lincecum (though it's good...Lincecum's is good FWIW)...from the stats, it looks like Cain is a guy the Sox are going to light the f*** up.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.