July 29, 200322 yr I wrote this article for futuresox.com and this is not a shameless plug, I was hoping to get some feedback and suggestions. Anybody got any ideas on how to improve it? The link is below. Who's Hot and Who's Not in the minors
July 29, 200322 yr I wrote this article for futuresox.com and this is not a shameless plug, I was hoping to get some feedback and suggestions. Anybody got any ideas on how to improve it? The link is below. Who's Hot and Who's Not in the minors Thats..... awsome. Seriously, it was really well written. I like it a lot.
July 29, 200322 yr I wrote this article for futuresox.com and this is not a shameless plug, I was hoping to get some feedback and suggestions. Anybody got any ideas on how to improve it? The link is below. Who's Hot and Who's Not in the minors My only suggestin is to include their season numbers as well as some basic info about the player, whether it is scouting report type info or even some personal info you might be able to dig up. Also, incluse the exact dates for the week in the synopsis at the top, rather than buried at the bottom. That's it. I like the idea. The Birmingham News does a Barons Clubhouse each week and has a Who's Hot and Who's Not piece. It is something I have always tried to catch.
July 29, 200322 yr Author My only suggestin is to include their season numbers as well as some basic info about the player, whether it is scouting report type info or even some personal info you might be able to dig up. Also, incluse the exact dates for the week in the synopsis at the top, rather than buried at the bottom. Thanks for the input. I was planning on adding a synopsis about how the team's did in the week for the future. I'll try to add more info about the players, but I don't know much about them yet. As I continue to follow the minors more in-depth I'll learn more and share that. As for the date, it's at the top of the article in the title.
July 29, 200322 yr Looks good except for one word in the Great Falls section.Not The Great Falls pitching staff- 60 IP, 52 ER The team has great hitting, but their pitching has been horrible. Hopefully the pitchers can raise their awful 5.45 team ERA. I would hope you mean "lower" their awful ERA... But other than that
July 29, 200322 yr Author Looks good except for one word in the Great Falls section.Not The Great Falls pitching staff- 60 IP, 52 ER The team has great hitting, but their pitching has been horrible. Hopefully the pitchers can raise their awful 5.45 team ERA. I would hope you mean "lower" their awful ERA... LMAO. It's funny nobody caught that one. I changed it to improve on. Thanks for catching it.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.