Everything posted by fathom
-
take it easy on ozzie
I'm making my popcorn, and pulling up a chair...
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
Can someone link me to the chat again please?
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
That's it, we're the Indians from Major League 2. I hope Ozzie sees his cardiologist soon.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:43 AM) What the f*** is up with these s***ty players hitting us? I think Grudz was 0 for his first 10 with 8 K's Nice grab by Mack! Grudz is actually a very good hitter, and he'll bloop you to death.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(jphat007 @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:41 AM) Don't bother. He's going to drive it into our heads. Funny how quiet you are when the team's getting their ass kicked. Even you're having trouble coming up with something positive. Here, I'll get you started....Brian Anderson showed a nice swing on his line drive hit last inning.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:38 AM) As did Garland and his 15 ERA. I think Garland sucked tonight, but he could have had a 6-1 lead going into the 5th inning. Instead, the game is 6-5 cause Ozuna looked like a punt returner who misjudged a punt.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
I'm so happy he made the team.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:37 AM) He was having a good offensive game. Who cares, he blew this game for us.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
No matter the outcome, I'm happy they're keeping Dessens in the game.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
It's amazing how much more effective Mackowiak can be against righties than lefties. What a novel concept.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
At least my new adopted team to give the Cubs hell, the Brewers, are 4-0. Man, would I love to have Brady Clark on our team.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:29 AM) Definitely not a 15 game lead but maybe holding a 6 run lead against the Royals would be nice? Even in a year where we won 110 games and the WS, we blew huge leads to the Royals. Some year, our pitchers are going to learn to stop throwing first pitch strikes to Sweeney.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(RockRaines @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:27 AM) Last year it took us 20 games until our first 3 game losing streak, this year 4 games. That's why I don't want to hear anyone tell us that "so and so worked last year, so don't worry about it". Last year's team had an amazing ability to win games they didn't deserve to win, and to barely squeak out games they should have won by more. We're all hoping for the best, but it's hard to win 2 straight years based on that same formula. We'll be fine!
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
As leader of the pessimists.....KEEP THE FAITH GUYS! We just have to play our regular starters more often, and we'll be fine. I hope no one was expecting us to have a 15 game lead again this year.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:26 AM) WTF IS WRONG WITH THIS TEAM This is no different than how spring training went. Thome was the only regular player who showed power, and the starting pitchers velocity was way down.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
Maybe, just maybe, this is the best thing that can happen for this team.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(Harry&JimmyRocked @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:22 AM) agreed. but blame OZZIE for sacrificing defense for supposed depth. TINKER TINKER TINKER The Cintron move seemed great because we thought that we'd keep Borchard, and get rid of Gload. Now, I'm just as confused as everyone else.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
Those guys we just had batting are always going to go 1-2-3 against a pitcher with a good, tight slider. Dessens kicked our ass last season on the Dodgers.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(Wedge @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:16 AM) What the hell is wrong with our starters? Did all of their deals with the devil expire? LOTS of wear and tear on their arms from last season. I never got the impression they were pushing it in ST, and it's going to take them some time to get up to speed.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:16 AM) Garland with a robust 15.19 ERA to start the season. Garland showed no ability to pitch over "errors" tonight, but I still believe we coast to a victory if Ozuna catches that first fly.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
Good stuff by Thornton there. He might have the Marte syndrome where his fastball is more effective vs righties because he can be effectively wild.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(Soxpranos @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:14 AM) Pudge, Shelton and Ordonez are a deadly threesome. They have speed, power and hitters that it for average... we'll see how this divison will unfold. Don't forget Carlos Guillen. I wonder if D. Young will go one for the season vs the Sox like he did last year? Did we give him a WS ring?
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:13 AM) That's usually why teams lose. Yeah, I actually said that as a positive. It's not like Game 2 vs the Indians, where they were just a better team than us. I think it's going to take the Sox a while to gel...and the rosters going to have to be tweaked.
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
The Tigers will be better as their hitters get used to hitting with their new "physiques".
-
Sox v. Kansas City, 4/7/06, Garland v. Affeldt
QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Apr 8, 2006 -> 02:11 AM) Everyone laughed at me yesterday when I was impressed with Detroit hammering these guys. Everyone said 'relax...it's the Royals'. Would you trade our offense for theirs? I would in a heartbeat....but of course, I'm often accused of hating the Sox.