3 BeWareTheNewSox 5

QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Apr 4, 2007 -> 04:24 PM) Alright. Farmer sounded like it was a great catch. He was probably just relieved because everyone watching figured it was gone

I love our chances against Borowski, let's go, end it quick Sox

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Apr 4, 2007 -> 03:51 PM) Talk about a f***ing implosion. If Aardsma gets out of this I will punch myself in the face I for one will enjoy this

McCarthy having a rough 1st inning, (EDIT, well, only a few of those were earned, guess there was an error in there)

Liked Jon today. Thought he was screwed early when the strike zone was everything from your chest and up, but both him and the ump ended up settling down

I didn't like that intentional walk, show some balls early on

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 4, 2007 -> 01:44 PM) Yeah like a real man like you, who looks at the team getting raped and says, more please. I can take it. Getting raped? Have you ever watched baseball before?

A bunch of babies here in this thread

In the other thread I said the 700K was nothing special, but today I think it looks much better. Also saw how the Cardinals game was widescreen. I actually uninstalled Mosaic yesterday out of frustration. Even at highest quality, the games looked like crap in the little squares, so has this improved?

EDIT: Okay, I found some games where 700 K would work. It's decent, but when it looks good, it seems the 400 feed isn't that far off. You can tell a difference, but I think it should be better. The Sun night telecast looked good but it looked just as good on 400 K too. Maybe a little more detail, but still a little blurriness, especially if you go full screen.

Hmm, I bought MLB.TV premium, and when I click the 700K feed, the bottom of windows media player says 'playing at 400K'. The Seattle Prem link doesn't even work for me. Looks like I have to go through Mosaic, which I hate though and also had issues today. You had spring, get your crap together MLB, especially if you're going to pull this exclusivity crap

Podsednik isn't as bad as some of our other lefties on lefties, he just doesn't get a lot of at bats, esp against these good ones. LOL at Pablo being the obvious choice, but being mad about Erstad when he pretty much had the same ones coming in, look up those stats both ways boys (and yes, I am an Anderson fan)

Toronto breaks the tie

lol at hawk throwing in the little bit of homerism in the end there

QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:06 PM) maybe he doesnt warrant being the number 1. Garland after last season should have been number 1. Agreed, but in the end it doesn't mattered, you're just delaying him getting lit up by a day or two (well you never know but still)

Dunn just launched another one

Masset in

So we get to test out this brand new and improved pen early huh

LOL our fans have some Hawk 'stretch' syndrome, chill out people, that wasn't that close

Lefty on lefty too (well, he's prob the most successful against CC on our team), BA might be in trouble

Erstad goes yard 5-2 now

Will be interesting to listen, but I hope this doesn't mean Singleton will carry the PBP load? Does Stone do any PBP?

I think we'll be fine this year but even I think those seem a bit too optimistic. I mean Javy, with those numbers? And pretty much every one else on the team is meeting or exceeding expectations.