Steff

And apparently you are not understanding what I am saying.. He said he is "lukewarm" on the matter, yet you told him... "no, your not, your pro-choice". You are questioning his definition. Why..? That's all I'm asking you. Why are you telling him he is something other than what he's defining himself as? And where was that Foulke thread.. on the PH board, right? So not on this forum..? And in that thread you came in and felt the need to tell us it was a non issue.. to those of us that were discussing it, it was an issue. If it wasn't an issue to you why bother responding..? This is a discussion board.. thus I am trying to discuss with you why you are doing this.

I do believe this is the first time I've posted to you in this forum.. so I don't "keep" doing anything. Why do you feel the need to challenge others opinions? Does it help you validate your opinions..? I would guess not. So why is it necessary to question someone's definition of something that doesn't make sense to you..? What is the goal? Why did you have to tell both CC and I that those who consider themselves "lukewarm" on an issue are wrong..? How is someone's personal feeling wrong..??? And who are you to decide that.. and question it?

C'mon.. hurry up and finishing replying already. I want to get out of here..

You keep calling it "pro choice" when CC clearly said what he feels he is. You say tomatoe, I say tamatoe... why do you feel the need to "correct" what he is saying? Which will likely lead to an "argument" - for lack of a better term - that doesn't need to happen.

HR doesn't have math skills. They sit in their offices and plan "fun" :rolly things all day.

Once again.. that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. I fail to see why you need to label the thoughts of others. You're simply egging on a fight.. when there is no point to one.

That starts at 4:15 today at Anyway's on Roosevelt..

Bubye Eye..

So HR makes us do this pumpkin carving contest every year. 1st place is $150 for the team, and 2nd place is 2 hours off. The accounting team wins and they are like "woooo hooo.. yea!! $150 bucks, we can order lunch (there was 25 people per team)" and the finance team (that's my group) won 2nd.. the accounting group is walking around like they are the s***.. and we're all laughing our asses off. The accounting "leader" says "aww.. to bad you guys didn't win".. we all look at her and say "enjoy your lunch @ $6 per person.. we'll enjoy or 2 hours off work". She thought about it and was nearly about to cry as she walked away..

Who cares. It's not even a sport...

Oye, oye, oye...

I never said any such thing.

No.

The Sox are not a public company. If the majority owners wanted their names out there.. they'd be out there. Obviously they don't - and with good reason, IMO. Jerry "ownes" just under 5%. He is the chairman. He verbalizes the boards decisions.

GS, right..?

I'd deal with it, or leave.

That's your opinion and you're entitled to it.

Don't know. Don't care. It's none of my business.

Well, you know it's going to happen. Might as well be prepared for it.

Just keep that in mind the next time you're s*** on for your opinion.

That makes them lukewarm on the matter.

Really.. you don't know anyone lukewarm on abortion..? Wow.. most people I know are lukewarm on it. "Depends on the situation" is a frequent answer I hear.

Don't know. Don't care. What I do know is he is not the owner.. and not even close to a majority shareholder.

For the 8,361,402 nd time.. Jerry does not own the Sox.

Why not? It's not that hard to make sure to not get into a position where that issue would directly effect your personal life. Unless either side is so extreme, I don't see it being an issue. If they are that extreme.. I don't see them in a long term relationship anyway.