BigHurt4evah Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 Well what do you think?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 This is not even a contest. Magglio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. That's been six years. I still think that Magglio is the best hitter in the lineup right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. That's been six years. I still think that Magglio is the best hitter in the lineup right now. I hate to do this, because I love Mags, but... The last season that Frank was himself was 2000. In that season, Frank was .328, 43, and 143. Mags was .315, 32, 126. Frank's OBP was .436, compared to Mags' .371. Mags was good, but Frank was great. Even look at last season. Frank had what was probably his worst year, and Mags had his best year. Yet, Mags' OBP was only 20 points higher than Frank's (.381 to .361). So again, Mags is good, but Frank is (still) better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 I still don't think you can say Frank is better until he does better. Does this poll mean the best hitter overall for the Sox (including past performance) or best hitter right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxPride3035 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 I think Ordonez is the White Sox best hitter. Frank may have had better seasons then Maggz has had, yes, i know, but i believe that Maggz will develop and grow as a player even more and soon become at least the equivelent of Frank Thomas in his prime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. That's been six years. I still think that Magglio is the best hitter in the lineup right now. I hate to do this, because I love Mags, but... The last season that Frank was himself was 2000. In that season, Frank was .328, 43, and 143. Mags was .315, 32, 126. Frank's OBP was .436, compared to Mags' .371. Mags was good, but Frank was great. Even look at last season. Frank had what was probably his worst year, and Mags had his best year. Yet, Mags' OBP was only 20 points higher than Frank's (.381 to .361). So again, Mags is good, but Frank is (still) better. Maggs' ba was 68 points higher last year, had 105 more total bases and his slugging was about 125 points higher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 I still don't think you can say Frank is better until he does better. Does this poll mean the best hitter overall for the Sox (including past performance) or best hitter right now? How unfortunate that missing a season with a very serious arm injury and a sub-par following season makes people forget what happened just 2 years ago. When Frank is healthy, he's the best hitter in the line-up, and one of the best hitters in the game. There is no disputing that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. That's been six years. I still think that Magglio is the best hitter in the lineup right now. I hate to do this, because I love Mags, but... The last season that Frank was himself was 2000. In that season, Frank was .328, 43, and 143. Mags was .315, 32, 126. Frank's OBP was .436, compared to Mags' .371. Mags was good, but Frank was great. Even look at last season. Frank had what was probably his worst year, and Mags had his best year. Yet, Mags' OBP was only 20 points higher than Frank's (.381 to .361). So again, Mags is good, but Frank is (still) better. Maggs' ba was 68 points higher last year, had 105 more total bases and his slugging was about 125 points higher. Comparing one person's best season to another's worst proves absolutely nothing. It's a waste of time to write it, and a waste of time for others to read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHurt4evah Posted February 17, 2003 Author Share Posted February 17, 2003 OK well this poll means best overall hitter, not best hitter right this second, best statistically, or best in the future. allow me to rephrase my question. if you could have one of these two men RIGHT NOW to hit in your lineup, who would it be? Jesus Christ can ya find people to disect a friendly question? hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. That's been six years. I still think that Magglio is the best hitter in the lineup right now. I hate to do this, because I love Mags, but... The last season that Frank was himself was 2000. In that season, Frank was .328, 43, and 143. Mags was .315, 32, 126. Frank's OBP was .436, compared to Mags' .371. Mags was good, but Frank was great. Even look at last season. Frank had what was probably his worst year, and Mags had his best year. Yet, Mags' OBP was only 20 points higher than Frank's (.381 to .361). So again, Mags is good, but Frank is (still) better. Maggs' ba was 68 points higher last year, had 105 more total bases and his slugging was about 125 points higher. Comparing one person's best season to another's worst proves absolutely nothing. It's a waste of time to write it, and a waste of time for others to read it. I don't see how referring to how Thomas did 6 seasons ago proves how good he will do now either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Fainter Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 If the Sox were to put both Maggs and Frank on the block, every general manager in baseball would be creaming in his gm shorts over Maggs, whereas Frank would induce a lot of yawns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. What years did Frank have those averages? '94, '96, and '97, respectively. That's been six years. I still think that Magglio is the best hitter in the lineup right now. I hate to do this, because I love Mags, but... The last season that Frank was himself was 2000. In that season, Frank was .328, 43, and 143. Mags was .315, 32, 126. Frank's OBP was .436, compared to Mags' .371. Mags was good, but Frank was great. Even look at last season. Frank had what was probably his worst year, and Mags had his best year. Yet, Mags' OBP was only 20 points higher than Frank's (.381 to .361). So again, Mags is good, but Frank is (still) better. Maggs' ba was 68 points higher last year, had 105 more total bases and his slugging was about 125 points higher. Comparing one person's best season to another's worst proves absolutely nothing. It's a waste of time to write it, and a waste of time for others to read it. I don't see how referring to how Thomas did 6 seasons ago proves how good he will do now either. My main argument from the outset was that Mags has never hit as high as Frank has, even as recently as 2 years ago, when BOTH are playing like they're supposed to be. This season will be the true test -- Frank has no more excuses (not that he ever really did, honestly), and Mags has evolved into a better hitter every year. They should compliment each other very well, to say the least. Even if you compare Mags' best year (2002) to Frank's most recent "no excuse" year (2000), Mags still comes up short. Great numbers, yes, but not quite up to the standards that Frank has set, and will continue to set in 2003. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 It doesn't look like you have a lot of support on your side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 It doesn't look like you have a lot of support on your side. The numbers support me -- that's all the support I need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 We'll have to remember this thread at the end of the season, so we'll know who was right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 We'll have to remember this thread at the end of the season, so we'll know who was right. Believe me, I hope both have great seasons. In order for the Sox to be successful, they're going to have to. Maybe they'll get co-MVP's. I wonder if that's ever happened with teammates? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 So do I. I kinda doubt that has ever happened, but that would be really cool if it did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHurt4evah Posted February 18, 2003 Author Share Posted February 18, 2003 hey I agree with clujer. I think Frank has proved how he can be the most dominant hitter in the majors, even in 2000. Maggs has shown he is a good hitter, but Frank has proved he's a great one. Maggs hasn't even started in the all-star game, and Frank has 2 MVP's?? (should be 3) I don't see how you can say its definately either, but both should have good seasons, and I'll remember to bring this up later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxplosion Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 I chose Maggs as the best hitter THIS year but I still think its close. Frank should have a great year and so should Paulie. But as of now, Frank is still the best player in Sox history, not Maggs... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 I think Maggs is an amazing hitter, but by no means would I be shocked if Frank completely owned the entire majors this season; he's that good. All I know is this team is going to be really fun to watch and I'm so excited for the start of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 When hitting like himself, it's Frank, hands down... Mags is still improving, so maybe soon it will be him, but until he hits .353, .349, or .347, it's gotta be the Hurt. I agree and as it was well said I only repeat and do not add more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.