July 1, 200421 yr A lot of things "could attract pedophiles or child pornographers." We haven't made being an altar boy illegal yet, and that certainly has, so clearly this is a ridiculous law.
July 1, 200421 yr A lot of things "could attract pedophiles or child pornographers." We haven't made being an altar boy illegal yet, and that certainly has, so clearly this is a ridiculous law. :headshake
July 1, 200421 yr Hopefully the VA DA will prosecute the case on strong merits & not something loose like "attracting pedophiles". This really is a challenge of rights to privacy vs indeceny laws. Unless the camp can provide reasonable assurance that the camp would not be accessible to the public's eyes the state should prosecute this under indeceny laws. The state has the right to protect the public from indecent exposure of both adults & minors. I do not believe this camp can provide this assurance since it is unlikely the air space would be restricted. All one needs to do is open a helicopter service to then provide indecent public exposure of the camp.
July 1, 200421 yr A lot of things "could attract pedophiles or child pornographers." We haven't made being an altar boy illegal yet, and that certainly has, so clearly this is a ridiculous law. You have a very twisted view on things.
July 1, 200421 yr hehehe.....am i the only one who finds it funny that the camp is called White Tail??????? lol :fthecubs juddling
July 1, 200421 yr You have a very twisted view on things. How so? I agree with the poster who discussed indecency laws...they have a decent case, but to challenge this based on "pedophiles and child pornographers" is ridiculous. Clearly the Catholic church has attracted pedophiles, and no one looks to shut them down...now rightfully so, but let's not make ridiculous statements about pedophiles where it doesn't apply.
July 2, 200421 yr What's ridiculous is how anyone would consider a naked body "indecent." Bunch of repressed whiners with too much time on their hands. It's a penis(or vagina). If it were alabaster or on canvas, it would be considered world-class art. But live, it's indecent? What a stupid waste of court time and tax dollars.
July 2, 200421 yr A lot of things "could attract pedophiles or child pornographers." Ban internet chat rooms and the entire intermet while they are at it
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.