March 22, 200323 yr How people deny he had weapons is popostorious to me. Heck, he's used some of the banned weapons already, yet people act as if he hasn't. they have been lobbing scuds at kuwait since this started Exactly Baggs, but wait, he doesn't have those weapons
March 22, 200323 yr There has been much discussion as whether these are scuds. Of course I am getting that news from BBC and not Fox. And what are the numbers of whatever has been lobbed? Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds?
March 22, 200323 yr Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Does it matter? Saddam said he had, and according to the UN-resolution was supposed to have, 0.
March 22, 200323 yr There has been much discussion as whether these are scuds. Of course I am getting that news from BBC and not Fox. And what are the numbers of whatever has been lobbed? Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? 4 of them and that is according to Fox, CNN, ABCNEWS, and many other stations.
March 22, 200323 yr Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Does it matter? Saddam said he had, and according to the UN-resolution was supposed to have, 0. it does matter in that 3 -4 non scud missiles are hardly the teports we had of scuds raining down on Kuwait BBC has very hesitant to call them scuds, thus my wondering if they are. If they weren't scuds then the violation you cite doesn't exist. I am listening to BBC now and hope to hear more on this and will let you know.
March 22, 200323 yr Are we looking at 3 or 4 or hundreds? Does it matter? Saddam said he had, and according to the UN-resolution was supposed to have, 0. it does matter in that 3 -4 non scud missiles are hardly the teports we had of scuds raining down on Kuwait Sorry cw..... but why does it matter when Saddam is supposed to have ZERO?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.