April 2, 200323 yr this is what dribble had to say, here is the link http://espn.go.com/mlb/spring2003/columns/...sc/1530851.html
April 2, 200323 yr this is what dribble had to say, here is the link http://espn.go.com/mlb/spring2003/columns/...sc/1530851.html I was surprised to see only one of the Oakland big 3 on there. I might have put Mulder or Hudson ahead of Myers
April 2, 200323 yr Author this is what dribble had to say, here is the link http://espn.go.com/mlb/spring2003/columns/...sc/1530851.html I was surprised to see only one of the Oakland big 3 on there. I might have put Mulder or Hudson ahead of Myers interesting and now after thinking about it, i agree.
April 2, 200323 yr Ya, you'd think they would of all been on there, but he must of been mixing it between some younger guys that have proven it and some that are going to breakout.
April 2, 200323 yr Ya, you'd think they would of all been on there, but he must of been mixing it between some younger guys that have proven it and some that are going to breakout. It is really a bad mix then. You look at the top 3 as guys who have already "broke out", Prior is inbetween, and Myers still isn't there yet. The more times I see that group of names the worse that I think it is. If it is breakout guys stick with that, if it is the "best" young pitchers, Prior and Myers shouldn't be on there, and guys like Wade Miller, Hudson, Mulder, etc need to be on it.
April 2, 200323 yr Plus Jarrod Washburn possibly and of course AJ Burnett. Yeah there are definately more guys I could add to that list. Those were just off of top of my head
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.