...should sacrifice their overtime pay because we are in wartime. It is the Republican Senator Ted Stevens from Alaska.

 

He stated that "I really feel strongly that we ought to find some way to convince people that there ought to be some volunteerism at home."

 

I guess Stevens forgot that 60 of the 343 dead firefighters/police on 9/11 were off duty. How about this asshat give up his pay for a while as a wartime sacrifice? :fyou Ted!

 

(brought to you a la www.rightwingslayer.com)

...should sacrifice their overtime pay because we are in wartime.  It is the Republican Senator Ted Stevens from Alaska.

 

He stated that "I really feel strongly that we ought to find some way to convince people that there ought to be some volunteerism at home."

 

I guess Stevens forgot that 60 of the 343 dead firefighters/police on 9/11 were off duty.  How about this asshat give up his pay for a while as a wartime sacrifice? :fyou Ted!

 

(brought to you a la www.rightwingslayer.com)

Clearly Sen. Stevens is an imbecile.

He needs to be kicked squarely in the scrotum.

That's typical of our politicians... from either party.

I bet he is not willing to give up any of his pay, just like a Washington bureaucrat.

I bet he is not willing to give up any of his pay, just like a washington bureaucrat.

Yep, the guy is a grade A asshat.

Apu, more asshatness abounds.

 

Did you see the State senator in Oregon who introduced a bill that states being at a protest where one person commits an act of civil disobedience would equate you as a terrorist. At which point you would face a minimum sentence of 25 years?

 

Or did you hear Woolsley's comments this week when he spoke. (He's supposed to be a key figure in the US mil. administration of Iraq post war) He called this a new world war and pretty much said. "Hey Syria, Egypt, Iran and Saudi Arabia, you're next!" Great way to make us seem like liberators, eh?

Apu, more asshatness abounds.

 

Did you see the State senator in Oregon who introduced a bill that states being at a protest where one person commits an act of civil disobedience would equate you as a terrorist. At which point you would face a minimum sentence of 25 years?

 

Or did you hear Woolsley's comments this week when he spoke. (He's supposed to be a key figure in the US mil. administration of Iraq post war) He called this a new world war and pretty much said. "Hey Syria, Egypt, Iran and Saudi Arabia, you're next!" Great way to make us seem like liberators, eh?

Yeah, I heard about that bill in Oregon. I HIGHLY doubt it will pass. A friend of mine was talking to his parents who live in Oregon and they said that this guy is pretty much a lone nutball and they are usually pretty progressive, so they don't think it will pass.

 

What an asshat Woolsley is. Did you hear that the CIA came out and said that they have ABSOLUTELY ZERO evidence that Syria sold Iraq night-vision goggles? Why is our administration lying so f***ing much. I guess they'll do anything to get that lovely oil.

It won't, but he isn't alone. There is some support for the bill though. That's what scares me. The administration is lying and they don't need to. This is one of the most successful military operations ever.

 

There are all sorts of reasons why this war is not the right thing to do Apu, but the argument against oil is a nonstarter. If it was really about oil, the US would allow the UN to lift sanctions.

It won't, but he isn't alone. There is some support for the bill though.  That's what scares me. The administration is lying and they don't need to. This is one of the most successful military operations ever.

 

There are all sorts of reasons why this war is not the right thing to do Apu, but the argument against oil is a nonstarter. If it was really about oil, the US would allow the UN to lift sanctions.

The US wants control of the oil. They can't get that if Saddam still has control.

These are the same idiots that want you not to get Overtime pay anymore more hours at regular rate at your bosses discretion.