January 21, 200521 yr This stuff really really bothers me. If the owners want to end salary inflation, they can just stop paying people so much more every contract. The NHL is not subject to anti-trust legislation because the teams are not in economic competition with each other.
January 21, 200521 yr QUOTE(Chisoxmatt @ Jan 20, 2005 -> 05:26 PM) I hope they dont start playing again. That way i dont have to watch the stupid highlights on sportscenter. Funny, that's exactly how I feel about basketball or college anything highlights.
January 21, 200521 yr QUOTE(The Critic @ Jan 21, 2005 -> 03:42 PM) Funny, that's exactly how I feel about basketball or college anything highlights. Gotta agree with you on that, Critic.
January 21, 200521 yr Division III Women's Ultimate Regional Semi-Finals. They're FANNNNNNNN tastic. Tonight on ESPN3
January 21, 200521 yr QUOTE(The Critic @ Jan 21, 2005 -> 03:42 PM) Funny, that's exactly how I feel about basketball or college anything highlights. OMG YOU DISSED BASKETBALL!!! IM GONNA CRY.
January 22, 200521 yr I actually like watching the Wolves more than the Hawks. But I'd watch either, if they were on.
January 22, 200521 yr QUOTE(winodj @ Jan 21, 2005 -> 05:27 PM) Division III Women's Ultimate Regional Semi-Finals. They're FANNNNNNNN tastic. Tonight on ESPN3 I prefer division III womens field hockey exhibition matches on ESPN 11.
January 22, 200521 yr QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jan 21, 2005 -> 05:37 PM) OMG YOU DISSED BASKETBALL!!! IM GONNA CRY. Just answering an opinion with an opinion. Cry if you feel like crying....
January 22, 200521 yr QUOTE(farmteam @ Jan 21, 2005 -> 06:53 PM) I actually like watching the Wolves more than the Hawks. But I'd watch either, if they were on. The Wolves have been far more fun to watch through most of their existence than the Slackhawks. As long as Dollar Bill is in charge of the Hawks I won't spend one thin dime on them. The Wolves are a far better value for my entertainment dollar for the simple reason ( among many others ) that they actually play like they give a damn about winning.
January 22, 200521 yr QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jan 22, 2005 -> 05:33 AM) The Wolves have been far more fun to watch through most of their existence than the Slackhawks. As long as Dollar Bill is in charge of the Hawks I won't spend one thin dime on them. The Wolves are a far better value for my entertainment dollar for the simple reason ( among many others ) that they actually play like they give a damn about winning. The only "counterpoint" I'd make to any of your post is that aside from assbag worthless morons like Mironov or Fleury, I think the Hawk PLAYERS give a damn about winning. They just haven't been very good. Which is the fault of the organ-I-zation, which I agree doesn't seem to care much if they win or lose, as long as the beer gets sold.
January 22, 200521 yr QUOTE(The Critic @ Jan 22, 2005 -> 08:45 AM) The only "counterpoint" I'd make to any of your post is that aside from assbag worthless morons like Mironov or Fleury, I think the Hawk PLAYERS give a damn about winning. They just haven't been very good. Which is the fault of the organ-I-zation, which I agree doesn't seem to care much if they win or lose, as long as the beer gets sold. A fair and accurate summation of the "mighty" Chicago Blackhawks.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.