April 23, 200520 yr QUOTE(winodj @ Apr 21, 2005 -> 11:25 PM) http://abclocal.go.com/wls/news/042105_ns_hyde.html what happened to this story??? drudge had a link to it that was expired...
April 23, 200520 yr Author I guess the so-called liberal media doesn't much seem to care that one of the people responsible for impeaching President Clinton admitted that the motive was revenge and not the Public Good.
April 23, 200520 yr QUOTE(sec159row2 @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 11:38 AM) what happened to this story??? drudge had a link to it that was expired... It was on drudge later that day that WLS radio retracted the story... oops.
April 23, 200520 yr 100 motives for 100 people. Can we get past that chapter? Clinton did make some mistakes, he lied, he was disrespectful to the office. It is a shame his legacy will be filled with innuendos and snide remarks. But he made that bed.
April 23, 200520 yr QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 01:05 PM) But he made that bed. There's a bed in the Oval Office??
April 23, 200520 yr QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 12:05 PM) 100 motives for 100 people. Can we get past that chapter? Clinton did make some mistakes, he lied, he was disrespectful to the office. It is a shame his legacy will be filled with innuendos and snide remarks. But he made that bed. Tex, the problem with this is that anything Clinton did that was not dealing with BJ-Gate was seen as "wagging the dog" (i.e. making any attempt to go after Al Qaeda) so indirectly, these "He got a BJ!" Congressional proceedings greatly inhibited the commander in chief's ability to protect the nation (and that's not even discussing the numerous extra-marital affairs that various presidents have had that had no impact on their ability to maintain the presidency i.e. FDR, JFK, etc.)
April 23, 200520 yr QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 06:07 PM) Tex, the problem with this is that anything Clinton did that was not dealing with BJ-Gate was seen as "wagging the dog" (i.e. making any attempt to go after Al Qaeda) so indirectly, these "He got a BJ!" Congressional proceedings greatly inhibited the commander in chief's ability to protect the nation (and that's not even discussing the numerous extra-marital affairs that various presidents have had that had no impact on their ability to maintain the presidency i.e. FDR, JFK, etc.) I think several things, including 9/11 could be traced back to BJ-gate. But both sides are equally at fault. Of course it was politically motivated. Maybe we learned a lesson here.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.