Rex Kickass Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 http://abclocal.go.com/wls/news/042105_ns_hyde.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sec159row2 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(winodj @ Apr 21, 2005 -> 11:25 PM) http://abclocal.go.com/wls/news/042105_ns_hyde.html what happened to this story??? drudge had a link to it that was expired... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted April 23, 2005 Author Share Posted April 23, 2005 I guess the so-called liberal media doesn't much seem to care that one of the people responsible for impeaching President Clinton admitted that the motive was revenge and not the Public Good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(sec159row2 @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 11:38 AM) what happened to this story??? drudge had a link to it that was expired... It was on drudge later that day that WLS radio retracted the story... oops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 100 motives for 100 people. Can we get past that chapter? Clinton did make some mistakes, he lied, he was disrespectful to the office. It is a shame his legacy will be filled with innuendos and snide remarks. But he made that bed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 01:05 PM) But he made that bed. There's a bed in the Oval Office?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 12:05 PM) 100 motives for 100 people. Can we get past that chapter? Clinton did make some mistakes, he lied, he was disrespectful to the office. It is a shame his legacy will be filled with innuendos and snide remarks. But he made that bed. Tex, the problem with this is that anything Clinton did that was not dealing with BJ-Gate was seen as "wagging the dog" (i.e. making any attempt to go after Al Qaeda) so indirectly, these "He got a BJ!" Congressional proceedings greatly inhibited the commander in chief's ability to protect the nation (and that's not even discussing the numerous extra-marital affairs that various presidents have had that had no impact on their ability to maintain the presidency i.e. FDR, JFK, etc.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 23, 2005 Share Posted April 23, 2005 QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 06:07 PM) Tex, the problem with this is that anything Clinton did that was not dealing with BJ-Gate was seen as "wagging the dog" (i.e. making any attempt to go after Al Qaeda) so indirectly, these "He got a BJ!" Congressional proceedings greatly inhibited the commander in chief's ability to protect the nation (and that's not even discussing the numerous extra-marital affairs that various presidents have had that had no impact on their ability to maintain the presidency i.e. FDR, JFK, etc.) I think several things, including 9/11 could be traced back to BJ-gate. But both sides are equally at fault. Of course it was politically motivated. Maybe we learned a lesson here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.