June 7, 200520 yr I give it an I as in incomplete. Not because the draft isn't finished, but because I'm wary of the picks, yet I know they can still suprise me. My initial reaction would have given this draft an F, but with guys like Liotta and Schurnstein suprising the heck out of me in the past, I have to give it an I.
June 7, 200520 yr I'll wait till its over and even than I think you have to give about 4 years before you know a draft.
June 9, 200520 yr I didn't follow college that much and I don't have a whole bunch of backround information on any of the players that we got later in the draft. So i agree, we should wait 4 years then judge the draft.
June 9, 200520 yr I want to at least see who they sign before I even grade how they drafted for value, little how the guys turn out.
June 9, 200520 yr QUOTE(danman31 @ Jun 9, 2005 -> 12:05 AM) I want to at least see who they sign before I even grade how they drafted for value, little how the guys turn out. I voted after day 1, but I agree fully. It totally depends on who they sign, who the DFE, etc. If they sign their first 5 guys and Danks, it's a freaking great draft even if Brooks is a reach and they don't sign anyone else, LOL... We'll see, Cortez and Cunningham will make a big difference in how this class grades out IMO, in addition to some of the later talent they drafted with DFE-potential.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.