November 15, 200520 yr https://subscribe.chicagotribune.com/faq.htm look at the picture with the newspaper, take a closer look
November 16, 200520 yr QUOTE(DABearSoX @ Nov 15, 2005 -> 04:11 AM) https://subscribe.chicagotribune.com/faq.htm look at the picture with the newspaper, take a closer look why would they do that? it makes no sense.
November 16, 200520 yr QUOTE(farmteam @ Nov 15, 2005 -> 10:14 PM) What am I missing? Look at the headline on the paper.
November 16, 200520 yr QUOTE(farmteam @ Nov 15, 2005 -> 10:14 PM) What am I missing? yeah that's what I'm thinking?
November 16, 200520 yr QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Nov 15, 2005 -> 10:17 PM) Look at the headline on the paper. Yes, very much worth the wait.
November 16, 200520 yr Wow, that is pretty bad...even for the Cubune. Edited November 16, 200520 yr by mr_genius
November 16, 200520 yr Uhhh, the Tribune ran that after the Cubs defeated the Braves. The Cubs waited 95 years for a postseason series victory!!!!!!! I really got out of Cub fans grasping to that "argument" before the Sox's run. I told them "but wouldn't you rather be known as the last Chicago team to in a pennant or a World Series?" Postseason series victories are meaningless unless you at least bring home a pennant.
November 16, 200520 yr Yeah, 2003-95=1908. It's an actual story from the Tribune. Why they chose to use that one on the faq page...hmm i wonder. About time they update it to the story of a real team actually accomplishing something worth the wait of 88 years.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.