December 16, 200520 yr this story is in a few places... http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/16/93904.shtml
December 16, 200520 yr QUOTE(sec159row2 @ Dec 16, 2005 -> 10:59 AM) this story is in a few places... And are all of those places as fair and balanced as Newsmax.com, Fox News, and the column of Robert Novak?
December 16, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 16, 2005 -> 01:01 PM) And are all of those places as fair and balanced as Newsmax.com, Fox News, and the column of Robert Novak? you mean they have an agenda? here's another similar story.. http://townhall.com/opinion/columns/emmett.../15/179164.html Edited December 16, 200520 yr by sec159row2
December 17, 200520 yr Yet, so many are quick to believe every thing they hear about W. Anything disparaging Queen Hillary is quickly dismissed. For example, wasn't Robert Novak the one involved in the Plame deal that the Dems jumped all over? "Prominent Democrats in Congress have spent much of the last decade in a campaign to suppress Barrett's report," columnist Robert Novak reported yesterday. "Its disclosures could dig deeply into concealed Clinton administration scandals." But now, what he has to say doesn't matter.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.