You said 'wrong' and 'really wrong', implying a difference between the two.  He read what you wrote correctly.

 

So there's no difference between killing two people and killing two thousand? I do think there is a difference.

 

Just like I think there's a difference between violating the constitution in two cases (although the courts found it to be legal, although i disagree), and violating the constitution so flagrantly and repeatedly that the call is now left up to a shift supervisor instead of the President.

That's the key word ... interpretations.  If and when it comes to point that Bush and Co.  are proven guilty of breaking the law, or even legally charged with it, as opposed to liberal rhetoric stating so, then I'll have a different outlook on it.  Until then, it's just a bunch of politicians playing politics.

 

So there's no difference between killing two people and killing two thousand? I do think there is a difference.

 

Pffft, you say that as if you thought 9-11 was a bigger deal than an LA drive-by double murder or something.