February 16, 200620 yr http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...tesox-headlines The money quote(for me, at least): Reinsdorf liked the idea of winning. He also believes that winning can be profitable because it means selling more tickets, suites, sponsorships and merchandise. This is where it gets complicated. Does spending more money guarantee the White Sox will win another championship? No, it doesn't. On the first day of spring training, they're probably not even as good as the Yankees or Red Sox. Screw you Dick Justice.
February 16, 200620 yr So the article is saying that the Astros are better than the Sox, Yankees, and Red Sox because they don't make moves? I don't get it. Maybe the Astros should play in the AL. Or maybe he could bother looking at the rosters of the Yankees and Red Sox and tell me where they are better. I hate it when someone throws facts in my face. Think this happens a lot?
February 16, 200620 yr Kind of a "i was late for my deadline and wrote this at 3am" type of article. Edited February 16, 200620 yr by RockRaines
February 16, 200620 yr Author QUOTE(RockRaines @ Feb 16, 2006 -> 11:19 AM) Kind of a "i was late for my deadline and wrote this at 3am" type of article. No s***, he even ended the whole thing abruptly.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.