QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Apr 2, 2006 -> 08:19 AM)

No, I didnt miss anything, in fact the exact quote you just used is what I quoted.  You said that the old limit used to be .100, as if that actually applied now.  It doesnt.  You also said that .133 is a damn good buzz and doesnt qualify as drunk in a vast vast vast vast vast majority of cases.  Which cases are these?  Do some judges like to say "Remember, the old limit used to be .100, so actually you didnt do so bad."?  No.  Who cares what the old limit was, it doesnt apply.  He was drunk, if the limit was .08 or if it was the old limit of .100.  Im not the one missing something here, but that doesnt surprise me.

equally as hilarious.  No no no, Abefroman isnt joking about a good pitcher being put in jail, he is a hardcore conservative.  Whatever.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

All Hammer is saying that many people, myself included, can function normally at .133. He, nor I, are trying to justify the situation at hand, Liriano did the wrongdoing, end of story.

 

Christ, do some people like to argue just for the sake of arguing?

All Hammer is saying that many people, myself included, can function normally at .133.  He, nor I, are trying to justify the situation at hand, Liriano did the wrongdoing, end of story.

 

Christ, do some people like to argue just for the sake of arguing?

 

Thank you, Mr Spokesperson/Civil man of the year.

QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Apr 2, 2006 -> 03:50 PM)

Thank you, Mr Spokesperson/Civil man of the year.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Thank you for offering nothing worthwhile to this conversation.

Thank you for offering nothing worthwhile to this conversation.

 

LOL, pot meet kettle.

 

Who gave you an atomic wedgie today?

And when Abe said 'Lock him up and throw away the key", I don't think it was due to the fact that Liriano is an up-and-coming pitcher on the Twins.  Nice angle, but I ain't buying that for a minute.  IMO dude is just another hardcore conservative.  I hope that I'm wrong, but I seriously doubt it.