June 9, 200322 yr When is the next presidential election and will the question of WMD affect your voting?
June 9, 200322 yr When is the next presidential election and will the question of WMD affect your voting? Nov 2004, and the only way that WMD's matter then is if the economy is still in the s***ter. If everyone is working no one cares about anything else.
June 9, 200322 yr Bush's ass may be saved because of weak Democratic Candidates. I don't think Kerry or any democrat for that matter is as strong as recent democrats. As far as WMD, I can not vote, so I can not say that they will affect my vote, but I do believe there will be more evidence of the evil of the Hussein regime, enough to convince the U.S. anyway. The big factor as SS2k3 said is the economy. Tony Blair on the other hand, is facing a huge dilemma over there with WMD in Iraq. I read in the last edition of Time that he may be called to resign by high ranking people within his own party. ...and Go bush in 2004!!! btw, if the republicans don't have a good candidate in 2008 I will be very disappointed. Hillary Clinton will win against a Republican push-over. Nothing against women, but do you really want Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president? A carpet bagger, and a frontrunner in the oval office?
June 9, 200322 yr 2008=Rudy G. He'd ANNIHILATE Hilary. She doesn't worry me then, like she'd worry me in 2k4.
June 10, 200322 yr Bush's ass may be saved because of weak Democratic Candidates. I don't think Kerry or any democrat for that matter is as strong as recent democrats. As far as WMD, I can not vote, so I can not say that they will affect my vote, but I do believe there will be more evidence of the evil of the Hussein regime, enough to convince the U.S. anyway. The big factor as SS2k3 said is the economy. Tony Blair on the other hand, is facing a huge dilemma over there with WMD in Iraq. I read in the last edition of Time that he may be called to resign by high ranking people within his own party. ...and Go bush in 2004!!! btw, if the republicans don't have a good candidate in 2008 I will be very disappointed. Hillary Clinton will win against a Republican push-over. Nothing against women, but do you really want Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president? A carpet bagger, and a frontrunner in the oval office? Dean & Kucinich are the only two Democrats that would viably be able to mobilize the left into anything cohesive to oust Bush. And I can say, as much as I hate Bush, I'd find myself voting for him if the Democrats nominate Lieberman. Lieberman scares me so much more. And the left won't be as divided because Nader is heavily considering not running for President because 2004 is too important an election to divide the left because the goal is to oust Bush from the White House. The evil of the Hussein regime may come to light, but that is NOT the reason the US went in for. They said that they KNEW Iraq had WMD's and if he didn't turn them over we would invade. After they couldn't find the WMD's, the idea became that we wanted "Iraqi freedom." [Quite the usage of Orwellian language by the Bush administration] If Paul Wellstone was still alive, I'd totally nominate him for President. And oh yeah did anybody see the huge fight between Al Franken and Bill O'Reilly on C-SPAN at the Book Expo?
June 10, 200322 yr Bush's ass may be saved because of weak Democratic Candidates. I don't think Kerry or any democrat for that matter is as strong as recent democrats. As far as WMD, I can not vote, so I can not say that they will affect my vote, but I do believe there will be more evidence of the evil of the Hussein regime, enough to convince the U.S. anyway. The big factor as SS2k3 said is the economy. Tony Blair on the other hand, is facing a huge dilemma over there with WMD in Iraq. I read in the last edition of Time that he may be called to resign by high ranking people within his own party. ...and Go bush in 2004!!! btw, if the republicans don't have a good candidate in 2008 I will be very disappointed. Hillary Clinton will win against a Republican push-over. Nothing against women, but do you really want Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president? A carpet bagger, and a frontrunner in the oval office? Dean & Kucinich are the only two Democrats that would viably be able to mobilize the left into anything cohesive to oust Bush. And I can say, as much as I hate Bush, I'd find myself voting for him if the Democrats nominate Lieberman. Lieberman scares me so much more. And the left won't be as divided because Nader is heavily considering not running for President because 2004 is too important an election to divide the left because the goal is to oust Bush from the White House. The evil of the Hussein regime may come to light, but that is NOT the reason the US went in for. They said that they KNEW Iraq had WMD's and if he didn't turn them over we would invade. After they couldn't find the WMD's, the idea became that we wanted "Iraqi freedom." [Quite the usage of Orwellian language by the Bush administration] If Paul Wellstone was still alive, I'd totally nominate him for President. And oh yeah did anybody see the huge fight between Al Franken and Bill O'Reilly on C-SPAN at the Book Expo? Well, Lieberman would be scary, and is definately not right for this situation. He doesn't seem to be decisive enough for my liking. And unfortunately, in this time of turmoil, I don't think having a jewish president would be a good thing for mid-east relations. As sad as it is to say that, I think most know it is the truth. No, I did not see the Bill O'Reily fight. My brother is a huge Bill O'Reily fan, I will have to ask him if he saw it.
June 10, 200322 yr I'm pulling for Kerry myself. And there is no way in all hell that I'd ever vote for Joe "Blame evereything on entertainment" Lieberman. If he gets nominated, I will vote for the Communist Party of America, dead serious.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.