Jump to content

How did we ever lose Fabio Castro?


xxx

Recommended Posts

How did we ever lose Fabio Castro? How does the Rule V draft work, I forgot how it works exactly? I was looking over some stats, and Fabio had a pretty good season for a 19/20 year old rookie. Wish we still had him, especially with Cotts the way he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(sayitaintso @ Oct 22, 2006 -> 09:18 PM)
He wasn't put on the 40 man roster and if you are not on it and you play a certain amount of years for that team you can be selected in the Rule V draft.

It's after five years that you are eligible for the Rule Five, hence the name. He was signed as a 16 year old in December of 2001, so that is why he's gone. Not putting him on the 40 man might come back to bite us in the ass..

Edited by whitesoxin'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fullcollapse @ Oct 22, 2006 -> 10:07 PM)
to finish the other half of the rules... any player selected in the rule v draft must be on the major league roster the entire year, or be offered back at half the cost.

Or disabled list, which, IIRC, Castro was on for some of this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering some of the players we had on the 40 man roster at the time (and the fact we actually had a couple openings) it was a very very bad move.

 

The Sox evidently didn't think highly enough to claim him (or that no one would take him) and either way they were wrong (since someone did take him and considering numerous scouts in other organizations liked him there was obviously value in Fabio, even if it was as trade bait).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Oct 23, 2006 -> 03:24 PM)
Considering some of the players we had on the 40 man roster at the time (and the fact we actually had a couple openings) it was a very very bad move.

 

The Sox evidently didn't think highly enough to claim him (or that no one would take him) and either way they were wrong (since someone did take him and considering numerous scouts in other organizations liked him there was obviously value in Fabio, even if it was as trade bait).

 

Like first overall in the draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Oct 23, 2006 -> 10:58 PM)
Like first overall in the draft

Ya, which is exactly why either way it was a serious oversight by the organization. If we thought they wouldn't take him, well they must not have paid much attention since he was the top guy and teams were fighting to trade for him and if we thought he didn't have value well shame on us because obviously he did have value (at least trade value) and we could have got a valuable chip or two for our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's almost ironic how this situation has played out.

 

Sox sign a young pitcher from the Domincan Republic at 16 -- an area of the world that's seemingly ignored by our scouts -- and lose him to the Rule Five draft. Of all the crap which makes it way through our system, we let go one of the few who have the potential to make something of his career.

 

Really, doesn't surprise me at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...