November 14, 200619 yr I thought carpenter would get it going 3-1 in the postseason but oh well. My favorite was all the cubs fans thinking zambrano was going to get it with the cubs in last place http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article...sp&c_id=mlb
November 14, 200619 yr Author oh well then i guess that makes sense. i remember him getting off to a very good start much like garland did two years ago. i think webb went 8-0? 9-0? not too shabby first half
November 15, 200619 yr Carpenter had better numbers and should've won it regardless of his postseason performance.
November 15, 200619 yr QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Nov 15, 2006 -> 04:28 AM) Carpenter had better numbers and should've won it regardless of his postseason performance. Carpenter's numbers werent really better... Roy Oswalt on the otherhand deserved it more than both of them and somehow received the least amount of votes.
November 15, 200619 yr QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Nov 15, 2006 -> 02:08 AM) Carpenter's numbers werent really better... Roy Oswalt on the otherhand deserved it more than both of them and somehow received the least amount of votes. Yeah, that's the odd thing to me.
November 15, 200619 yr QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Nov 15, 2006 -> 02:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Carpenter's numbers werent really better... Roy Oswalt on the otherhand deserved it more than both of them and somehow received the least amount of votes. Carpenter: 15-8, 3.09 ERA, 221.2 IP, 184 K's 1.07 WHIP Oswalt: 15-8, 2.95 ERA, 220.2 IP, 166 K's, 1.17 WHIP Webb:16-8, 3.10 ERA, 235 IP, 178 SO, 1.13 WHIP Same amount of losses, almost identical wins, Carpenter has the much better WHIP and K/9. Oswalt only has the edge in ERA.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.