Jump to content

Ozzie=ball Goes Flat


BigEdWalsh

Recommended Posts

QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 09:26 AM)
It is absolutely true. 2005 Kid's days from about August on, some players were exempt.

 

If you say so. However Google and WS.Com have nothing, as well WSI search goes back that far and also has nothing. I find it hard to believe it wasn't talked about anywhere but here.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is absolutely true. 2005 Kid's days from about August on, some players were exempt.

 

It is true, certain players are sometimes excused for various reasons. Two different times I went with a neighborhood group and heard the parents and kids expressing their disappointment that certain guys weren't signing. I seem to recall it was the starting pitcher and a bullpen guy or two. I'm not into autographs so I can't recall specifically, but I do know certain guys weren't signing those two times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 09:42 AM)
It is true, certain players are sometimes excused for various reasons. Two different times I went with a neighborhood group and heard the parents and kids expressing their disappointment that certain guys weren't signing. I seem to recall it was the starting pitcher and a bullpen guy or two. I'm not into autographs so I can't recall specifically, but I do know certain guys weren't signing those two times.

Yeah. You can pick up a sheet on the day of the game which tells you who's signing and where. A few times I noticed players that were supposed to be there weren't, evidently excused for whatever reason. No big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BigEdWalsh @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 09:50 AM)
Yeah. You can pick up a sheet on the day of the game which tells you who's signing and where. A few times I noticed players that were supposed to be there weren't, evidently excused for whatever reason. No big deal.

 

 

So this was something more along the lines of a last minute scratch?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 09:52 AM)
I guess where I'm disagreeing is that "OZZIE SAID"... I'm not sure this was an OZZIE policy, but that's nitpicking.

 

 

Or that the entire starting squad was excused... :huh

 

I would expect holy hell to break out at the park if that were to have happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess where I'm disagreeing is that "OZZIE SAID"... I'm not sure this was an OZZIE policy, but that's nitpicking.

 

Some teams, players actually, have clauses in their contracts which allow them to skip "x" number of these types of obligations. There may also be the common sense factor, i.e. if a guy is getting treatment before the game or whatever, he may be excused. There could be all sorts of reasons, but I do know not all the guys are there signing for every Kid's Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 09:56 AM)
Some teams, players actually, have clauses in their contracts which allow them to skip "x" number of these types of obligations. There may also be the common sense factor, i.e. if a guy is getting treatment before the game or whatever, he may be excused. There could be all sorts of reasons, but I do know not all the guys are there signing for every Kid's Day.

 

If they have a clause they they don't have to sign then they shouldn't be on the list to sign anyway. There are only 6 signing stations on kids day. I don't think the entire squad has ever been out there at once. And IIRC, 2 of them are usually for the manager and bp or bench coach.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they have a clause they they don't have to sign then they shouldn't be on the list to sign anyway. There are only 6 signing stations on kids day. I don't think the entire squad has ever been out there at once. And IIRC, 2 of them are usually for the manager and bp or bench coach.

 

Who knows. I'm not all that interested in all the peripheral stuff anyways like who autographs, golf outings, and so on. I wanted to comment because I had to sit next to a few disappointed kids/parents after certain guys weren't available, 2 times. Regardless I doubt the White Sox include such clauses because Reinsdorf in particular insists on as much fan friendliness as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 10:13 AM)
Who knows. I'm not all that interested in all the peripheral stuff anyways like who autographs, golf outings, and so on. I wanted to comment because I had to sit next to a few disappointed kids/parents after certain guys weren't available, 2 times. Regardless I doubt the White Sox include such clauses because Reinsdorf in particular insists on as much fan friendliness as possible.

 

 

Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 11:07 AM)
If they have a clause they they don't have to sign then they shouldn't be on the list to sign anyway. There are only 6 signing stations on kids day. I don't think the entire squad has ever been out there at once. And IIRC, 2 of them are usually for the manager and bp or bench coach.

Maybe that was the solution, because a couple of years ago, the entire team or close to it was out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless the reporter has a quote he wants to include of A.J. b****ing, I don't give it too much credence. It just fits too neatly in to the narrative the national sports media has about A.J. There seems little reason to throw that line in the article, save to stoke the ashes. I bet A.J. hates puppies too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Linnwood @ Aug 13, 2007 -> 11:45 AM)
Unless the reporter has a quote he wants to include of A.J. b****ing, I don't give it too much credence. It just fits too neatly in to the narrative the national sports media has about A.J. There seems little reason to throw that line in the article, save to stoke the ashes. I bet A.J. hates puppies too.

 

I don't pretend to know AJ as well as some of the other posters, but my experience with people in general is that where there's smoke, there's usually fire. While I'm sure that the media piles on AJ when they shouldn't (just like they pile on Barry), I'm not naive enough to think that AJ isn't responsible for much of it. AJ had a reputation for being a disruptive punk long before he signed with the Sox. And if the story is true, his baggage was enough that he literally had to beg Kenny to give him a shot. His tifts with Ozzie and Mark earlier this year seemed typical of the rumors that we heard about him years ago.

 

I like AJ's fire, competitiveness, and Baseball IQ. But outside of that, I don't hold him in the same regard as some of his teammates.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was an annoying article, as there's no reason to be stirring crap about Ozzie right now. There's a lot of other teams that are actually in the race that should be focused on. However, I was good friends with one of AJ's best friends (was in his wedding), and he basically said that AJ isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...