April 12, 200917 yr WTF? The bullpen has been pretty good so far this year, but for one bad night. And we need ideas? MacDougal is MacDougal - he'll do fine when the pressure is off, and implode when its is on. He's gone soon, we can only hope. And I agree with qwerty that Carrasco was fortunate last year, he isn't great. Egbert and Wassermann would, IMO, be better choices. BUT, this is ONE GAME we are reacting to - let's be a little more patient about it than this. Sheesh.
April 12, 200917 yr QUOTE (qwerty @ Apr 10, 2009 -> 10:30 PM) Macdougal will be gone sooner rather than later unless if the unexpected transpires. I like to think carrasco got by on smoke and mirrors, he is far from a long term option, short term for that matter either. My point is you do not bring up someone for the sake of of bringing them up... though it sometimes comes to that due to desperation. I agree with all of this. QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 11, 2009 -> 08:44 PM) WTF? The bullpen has been pretty good so far this year, but for one bad night. And we need ideas? MacDougal is MacDougal - he'll do fine when the pressure is off, and implode when its is on. He's gone soon, we can only hope. And I agree with qwerty that Carrasco was fortunate last year, he isn't great. Egbert and Wassermann would, IMO, be better choices. BUT, this is ONE GAME we are reacting to - let's be a little more patient about it than this. Sheesh. The fact that they took Wass off the 40 man should tell you he's likely done in a Sox uni.
.thumb.jpg.1bfa21502c2c2825cb6fd525bc016063.jpg)
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.