November 25, 201312 yr I just looked them up and a few sites had it listed as 347 down the lines....that doesn't seem right. I could have sworn it was like 335 unless they just moved them back recently and I missed that news?
November 25, 201312 yr QUOTE (chisoxfan310 @ Nov 25, 2013 -> 01:30 PM) I just looked them up and a few sites had it listed as 347 down the lines....that doesn't seem right. I could have sworn it was like 335 unless they just moved them back recently and I missed that news? 347 is the original, pre-remodel, dimensions. It is 335 and 330 to the corners.
November 25, 201312 yr Author QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 25, 2013 -> 01:35 PM) 347 is the original, pre-remodel, dimensions. It is 335 and 330 to the corners. Ah thanks for the help. I wish it was still that big.
November 26, 201312 yr 347 down the lines was the Old Comiskey Dimensions if I recall correctly as well.
November 27, 201312 yr The 347 down the lines reminds me of the Joey Belle days. I liked new Comiskey better when the lines were 347, used to be one of of the tougher parks to hit one out and now its one of the easiest. Edited November 27, 201312 yr by StRoostifer
November 28, 201312 yr QUOTE (JohnCangelosi @ Nov 25, 2013 -> 07:01 PM) 347 down the lines was the Old Comiskey Dimensions if I recall correctly as well. 352
November 29, 201312 yr QUOTE (oldsox @ Nov 28, 2013 -> 10:25 AM) 352 http://www.andrewclem.com/Baseball/Diag/ComiskeyPark.gif also: http://www.ballparks.com/baseball/american/comisk.htm Seems it was 352 for a while as well, but 347 when I was a kid in the 80's Edited November 29, 201312 yr by JohnCangelosi
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.