Jump to content

jphat007

Members
  • Posts

    10,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jphat007

  1. QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 15, 2007 -> 01:40 PM) Wow, do we suck. This team's talent is incredibly overrated. Fathom it's posts like this that really bring you down. I mean, seriously.
  2. Unreal. Baseball just makes no sense at times.
  3. Pods hits it hard for an out. Ozuna bloops the hell out of it for a hit. Go for bloops.......
  4. We're gonna one hit them and lose. Unreal.
  5. QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 15, 2007 -> 01:24 PM) Tough luck....Mackowiak should have never been hitting there though. Great managing again. Please fix this roster KW. Have you seen Cintron hit so far this year? He looks terrible. Mack was at least good in ST. He hit the ball hard. Shouldve been a base hit.
  6. Figures it doesn't snow on the one day it's supposed to when we have to face CC again. Typical of this year. Breaking tradition, I'm not even gonna do the gamethread today. We're gonna get rocked. Or lose 1-0 in 5.
  7. Hey, there's the guy with the third best OPS on our team. LOL.
  8. QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:44 PM) It's the first thing he's had in the box score besides an AB and K in a long time. He only has 1 SO in 24 ABs this year.
  9. Haha. I'm not sure how some of you guys make it through a 162 game season.
  10. QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:14 PM) Pods over Sizemore? We all make bad proclamations sometimes. That's fine. But quote s*** I said. Don't make up s*** I didn't say. And I didn't say I'd take Pods over Sizemore either.
  11. QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:12 PM) Sure this coming from a person who wanted Buerhle over Johan. Hawk at least would want Johan over Buerhle, and he is a homer. Quit freakin posting s*** I didn't say. I never said I'd take Buerhle over Johan. NEVER did I say that in that thread last night. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
  12. QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:10 PM) Why? The ball landed a few feet away from a slow tip toeing Erstad. I'm not really sure how he wouldn't have gotten to it. A few feet? You need to watch the replay after the game.
  13. QUOTE(SoxAce @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:08 PM) Already two people think so. Not sure about you but IMO BA would have at the very, very least made it close. Well of course. I'd expect most everybody here to say it. That does nothing to convince me. He wouldnt have gotten it.
  14. QUOTE(SoxAce @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:06 PM) Uribe has been horrible defensively. i wonder if BA would have got that... nvm... he would have. You are joking right? There is NO chance BA gets to that. Anybody for that matter
  15. Dammit Masset. That makes it really, really tough.
  16. QUOTE(caulfield12 @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 01:00 PM) And Rauch. I was eviscerated earlier this week when suggesting a change in batting coaches, but another week of this, if the pitching continues to be strong, and you'll start hearing murmurs. LOL. You'll start hearing murmurs of this board. Not by anybody who means anything though.
  17. Great job Masset, Dye, and especially Danks!.
  18. Just not good. Shoulda sent him the way we're swinging.
  19. QUOTE(shoota @ Apr 14, 2007 -> 12:25 PM) It's weird following a Sox team with a bad offense. I can't even remember a Sox team that couldn't hit. Are you being serious? I can remember a hell of a lot of times that the Sox have struggled over a 2 week period in the last few years.
×
×
  • Create New...