Balta1701
-
Posts
128,402 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
73
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by Balta1701
-
-
1 minute ago, SoCalChiSox said:
Disagree. NYY lacks leverage here.
Unless they are willing to pay a ton of money and tax, they are stuck, especially if Martino's report is right about other teams having superior offers.
“Unless the Yankees are willing to spend money they have no leverage”.
I would like to challenge you to read this sentence again.
-
Surely if nothing happens this time it will be the last time people believe “insiders”.
-Automated post, repeats daily.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, DirtySox said:
Not sure how to read this. Is he comparing the current Yankees offer to past offers from other teams? Or does this read as Getz is soliciting a bunch of current offers from other teams that trump this new Yankees proposal?
The Yankees probably put in a polite call to see if the Spring results had dramatically dropped the price on Cease, but aren’t going to pay a high price for him based on this. The likely scenario is that this loss is a huge problem for them and trying to barely patch it with Cease isn’t getting them anywhere.
-
Just now, Quin said:
Somehow still better than Pedro's clubhouse.
I’m honestly not sure about that. I think Pedro had a worse roster, and an organization around them that cared less (see Clevinger getting to use Gold Digger as an example). I think that 2022 clubhouse was a disaster.
More people in 2022 were clearly under contract for the next year, and no one was traded away, so fewer people to rip the team. The only guy they got rid of, Keuchel, ripped the team.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, SoCalChiSox said:
Yeah but that's the scenario at issue. He knows he doesn't have forever because JR could go at any time, so he does need immediate or close to immediate returns on his trades so he can burnish his rep for the next owner or if they are gonna clean house either way, then he needs some positive results to get another job.
I just don't see him taking a main piece that won't see the league for like 3 years. Secondary pieces that are high upside but far away (Lalane)...sure...main ones no.
Eh, if this offseason tells me anything, it's one of two things:
a. He really believes he's built a good team out of defenders and former Royals, and will be stunned by the results in April, or
b. He is willing to think long term and not make Hahn-like decisions that do damage to the organization long term.
This sure looks like the offseason of someone who is willing to think long-term. He didn't rush a Cease trade for the MLB-ready pieces that Milwaukee brought back, he didn't trade away many of the key guys who might take until 2026 to even arrive (Quero, Schultz both could have been that), he didn't waste very much on win-now money. Contrasting this with Hahn's 2023 offseason with the Benintendi signing (ugh), the Clevinger signing (UGH), bringing back Andrus (Sigh), and there's a clear difference.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Tnetennba said:
This spring should serve as all the confirmation we need. Perhaps another org can turn him into a viable bullpen piece, because it sure doesn’t look like it will happen here.
If his April is a disaster, I'd definitely give it a shot. I wouldn't judge that based on spring alone, it's not like we are looking at a team where every win in April is likely to count. See how he looks in the first 5 starts, and if they're like yesterday, give the bullpen a shot.
-
30 minutes ago, NO!!MARY!!! said:
The Super Bowl rotation was Miami, New Orleans and Los Angeles until they started adding more in the 1980s.
It wasn't nearly as big of a business for the local communities at that time though, and there weren't nearly as many fancy domed stadiums at the time.
Houston has had 2 since NRG stadium was built and I wouldn't be surprised if they had a 3rd in the next 10 years. LA seems likely to get another as well.
-
50 minutes ago, ScootsMcGoots said:
I know spring results aren't supposed to be indicative of regular season results but...you have to take some of it into consideration. I mean, they are 1-8 in the last 9 games. The team has to at least feel like what it means to win. I have a feeling this team will barely win 50 games. It will truly be a historically awful season.
I actually sorta was expecting different results in the spring. So many old NRIs trying to stay in the big leagues, with tons of previous big-league camp experience, I expected these guys to probably come out ready to go in the spring and maybe even be surprisingly good because they were all fighting for jobs. I expected them to be beat down when we got to the regular season and everyone else started trying. It's a little surprising to me that they're playing this badly in the spring.
-
1 hour ago, Quin said:
Hell, they were more unified for TLR.
They completely lost the plot for Grifol. It's why he needs so many vet leaders playing FASTs on a train that there's no room for rookies.
2022 was a mess. I still don't know what happened with that 8 game losing streak when everyone forgot how to play defense (including Anderson), Keuchel ripped his defense, Leury batted 3rd because he had a good time in the batting cages, they had the entire season of weird injury issues that people tried to play through for no good reason, etc.
-
1
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Milkman delivers said:
Have you heard our Vice President speak?
Sorry to bring politics into the conversation, but I think we can all agree that she wins the nonsensical word salad Olympics.
"Tremendous bad management of entitlements. There’s tremendous amounts of things and numbers of things you can do. So I don’t necessarily agree with the statement. I know they're going to end up weakening Social Security because the country is weak. I mean, take a look at the stock market, our, what we're going through hell. People have, I believe that number is 50%. They say 32 and 33%, I believe we have a cumulative inflation of over 50%."
-
2 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said:
Lol was thinking the same. It’s such a cushiony job he has it for the next decade if he wants it.
I mean, there's one thing that could make it less than a decade, but hard to schedule that.
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, 77 Hitmen said:
This seems to be the case with any cold-weather city with an indoor stadium - yes, the NFL gives them a Super Bowl, but it's one and done. Detroit and Minneapolis have had two each, but only after they replaced their old domes with new stadiums. Unlike warm weather cities, I don't expect Detroit, Minneapolis, or Indianapolis to be in the rotation for another Super Bowl again. Chicago would probably be in the same boat given the typical weather here in Chicago in early Feb. even if the game itself is indoors.
So, the promise that spending $1B+ in public funds will land Chicago a Super Bowl - it'll just be a one-time thing and not a recurring event.
I think some of that will be that the cities are smaller and so are the stadia. Over a full 30 years stadium lifetime, in Chicago, I’m guessing two assuming they build a quality venue.
-
1 hour ago, Soxfest said:
It’s growing close to saying Kopech is a total bust
We actually do have enough warm bodies in the rotation that trying him in the bullpen mid year is an option.
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, SoCalChiSox said:
I think part of the equation is that Getz kind of needs the payoff to be semi-immediate (24 or 25) otherwise he risks getting assets for his successor. If Arias ETA is like 27, it doesnt really help him with job security, esp if there's a new owner before then.
He needs the optics of a shiny new mega savage hitting bombs out of GRF for his resume.
These are ofcourse supposed to be illegitimate considerations in the abstract, but we all know they are present in the political calculus and will make it harder for the FO to accept an Arias/Hampton package.
Because if there’s any job in the world where you’re expected to have success and be evaluated based on that success…it’s GM of the White Sox?
-
1
-
2
-
-
Well that should solve it.-
1
-
3
-
-
-
12 minutes ago, South Side Hit Men said:
Strasberg won the World Series on his $175M Free Agent contract, signed in May 2016 after his final January 2016 Arbitration 3 hearing.
He would have been a free agent after that season, but signed a clean new contract which did not include any arbitration seasons like a lot of these hi-bred part arb years part FA recent deals.
I’m in agreement that a substantial number of long term pitching deals don’t work out. That said, teams committed to high priced pitching, be it FA or Trade or Extension are committed to winning, something missing from the equation here.
This also applies for much smaller White Sox contracts in terms of highest MLB deals at the time when it came to Frank Thomas and Mark Buehrle having solid to great seasons after leaving the White Sox under relatively cheap deals. Both players could have and should have finished their careers as lifelong Chicago White Sox.
As far as I can tell, the last 3 WS winners had zero active pitchers with 9 figure deals, the Rangers had 1 buried. The Dodgers had 1, the Nationals 2, the Red Sox look to have had 1 in David Price, the 2017 Astros 0, the 2016 Cubs 1, the Royals and Giants 0.
-
Bump
-
1
-
1
-
-
47 minutes ago, Lip Man 1 said:
Bears will announce Monday they are shifting stadium focus and get this...they have decided to invest two billion in private funds to make it happen:
Your link doesn’t work.
-
13 minutes ago, South Side Hit Men said:
- Verlander signed an extension with the Astros after 2019 and again after 2021, went to two World Series after his extensions with the Astros winning one.
- Kershaw is a lifelong Dodger, reached three World Series and won one under his $215M 2014-2020 contract.
- Stephen Strasburg is a lifelong National.
- Max Scherzer signed his free agent deal with the Nationals before winning in 2019.
Four pitchers, signed by teams that wanted to win, and then won with those teams committed to win.
Strasburg was not signed by the Nationals, he was drafted by the Nationals.
Verlander was traded for by the Astros. I guess you are correct there are two guys on that list who were extended by their current franchises, but Verlander was most definitely acquired by trade from the Tigers and Strasburg was absolutely drafted by the Nationals.
The only big money free agent pitcher who has recently won a title seems to be Scherzer.
-
15 minutes ago, South Side Hit Men said:
Helps to have the best pitchers in the game if you want to win a World Series.
If you want to waive a 2nd/3rd place carrots at fans every year, and blame fans for your shoddy product and stadium you wanted, not so much.
- 2023 Texas Rangers (Max Scherzer)
- 2022 Houston Astros (Justin Verlander)
- 2020 Los Angeles Dodgers (Clayton Kershaw)
- 2019 Washington Nationals (Max Scherzer, Stephen Strasburg)
- 2018 Boston Red Sox (Chris Sale)
- 2017 Houston Astros (Justin Verlander)
Literally one of those was obtained as a free agent from other teams. (One, Kershaw, was resigned). This makes a very strong case that paying high prices for free agent pitching isn’t a good move.
-
10 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:
So random thought, but what if Soroka magically returns to form? Would he be a guy worth trying to extend or would we better off flipping him? He won’t be 27 until August, so age wise he’s a legit fit for us. Can’t even begin speculating what an extension might look like, but my guess is it wouldn’t be exorbitant.
But if you send Crochet down to AAA for a few months and claw back that extra year of control like I proposed, there is a path to a pretty solid rotation of the future (and as soon as next year) if paired with a Soroka extension.
- Soroka
- Crochet*
- Nastrini
- Eder*
- Cannon
That rotation would obviously be lacking at the very top even if Soroka were to return to form (unless Crochet were to take a massive leap forward), but it could theoretically be solid enough to be competitive in the AL Central and you’re hope would be that Schultz and whomever we take at the 1.05 (if we go with a pitcher) could eventually provide that type of TOR production.
This is all hypothetical at the moment and most of the guys highlighted above have a ton of question marks, but it’s fun to dream on guys like Soroka and Crochet going from complete wild cards to rotation stalwarts. And if it were to happen, it would greatly increase our chances of being competitive by 2026.
Absolutely flip him (unless the team is in first place because he’s a cy young candidate).
Do you trust his body enough to give him an extension even covering next year? Let alone a multi year deal? If he’s spectacular in April and May we will be praying he stays healthy through mid July and begging Getz to get a deal done before his next start.
Hed have to be one of the top Cy Young candidates before I’d even think about giving him a QO.
-
12 minutes ago, GreatScott82 said:
I hope Pedro gets fired FAST in 2024. But something tells me Getz doesn’t have the courage to fire one of his KC besties. Even if he goes 10-30 to start the season, Getz still will likely keep him around. Those KC veins run deep!
If Terry Francona came out of retirement to manage this team, can you confidently say they wouldn’t start 10-30 with him?
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, pcq said:
At least 9,999,999 posts until Comiskey III is built.
This question is legit. Longest thread in Soxtalk history will be:
Fire Chris Getz
Building in the south loop
Dylan Cease trade concepts
-
1
-
1
-
Cease To Padres per Passan
in Pale Hose Talk
Posted
And Dylan Cease will single handedly make it excellent?