Everything posted by StrangeSox
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:54 PM) Oh Hawk....I can't wait to hear you state how tough the division is every single night. He's like a broken record already.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
Rally time!
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(SoxAce @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:53 PM) Zumaya is in. We might put a run up. Whew. At least they managed to knock out Cy Durbin. They had NO chance against that meatball pitcher. Pitches were too easy to hit so they got all jumpy and excited.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:51 PM) I've missed some games on TV this year, but has Crede made a diving stop all season? He made one last night, I think, and one in Buerhle's gem. Zumaya in
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:49 PM) Complete game for Cy crapo now. 6 run lead should do it. If this team gets CG shutout by Durbin....I...I just don't know. They should probably refund the fans for tonight's game though.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
so bad
-
Scientists find most Earth-like planet yet
QUOTE(Jake @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:14 PM) It is actually believed that traveling at the speed of light only benefits the traveler. When one travels near the speed of light (it is impossible to match it), you actually travel forward in time. For example, if you took a few minutes to ride at lightspeed around Central Park, your friends who saw you off would probably be dead when you came back. However, you would only be a few minutes older. I'm no expert, but physics is a really fascinating subject. That's a little exaggerated, but, yes, relativity does say that. It would take a lot longer than a few minutes for the person to be dead, though.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:43 PM) Time for Boone Logan to get shelled and lose any confidence he just built...why the f*** is he still in? Why bother wasting another arm?
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:41 PM) the only good thing, is that this will keep Durbin in the rotation for the foreseable future. And real hitting teams will rock this thing into the stratosphere. Durbin now joins a long laundry list of bad pitchers who look better than their ERA against us. Its the Joe Mays approach. Spot low and away, and bounce pitches in the dirt. You spot that pitch low and away and let the magic happen. 3 f***ing hits against this. Embarassing. I think every batter sees a really hittable pitch every third pitch, too.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(JDsDirtySox @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:40 PM) I am just amazed that BA can't see the difference in the fastball and a changeup. I am just amazed that BA can't see the difference in the fastball and a changeup. Durbin's got a better fastball/ changeup combo than Santana, don't ya know?
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
at least something has gone right this game.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
day-to-day abdominal strain for mick mac mackowiak
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:26 PM) So what? The Sox did their job. Or were they suppose to get shut down by them? Using runs gotten off the worst bullpen in baseball (including some hilarious unearned ones last night) doesn't make for a very solid argument that the team hitting has turned around.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:25 PM) Looks like Gonzalez has some of the same quality mechanics at the plate than Anderson does. Every player comes up with the same problems, and nowhere near ready to hit MLB pithcing. Why hasn't this been fixed?
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:20 PM) It's true. Does Walker get any credit for the streak they're are (were?) on? Why let one bad game in the stretch (with a horrid lineup) be solely responsible for his future with the Sox? 2 of those games in the good stretch came against the Royals and the Royals bullpen.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(knightni @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:11 PM) Question. Can you put Anderson in RF, then pinch hit Thome for Danks, then replace Danks with a RP after the at-bat? Follow up question. Is ozzie smart enough to think of this if it can be done?
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(Soxfest @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:06 PM) Ozzie makes no sense team sucks scoring for Danks so what does he do sits Dye and Thome. Way to help the kid land of OZ! I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not. They're both minorly injured.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(RockRaines @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:05 PM) Call him out for what? Did he injure half his team? He DH'd the better OF and left absolutely no option in case something happened to one of the OF's.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(TheOcho @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:03 PM) I feel bad for Andy Gonzalez. Me too. And Danks. He hasn't pitched great, but he has known since the 1st that he wasn't going to get any sort of run support.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:03 PM) There is no reason outside of teamwide food poisioning that Chad Durbin should be still in this game. He should of given up about 7 runs in 3 innings. But the corpseball attack is doing its best to strand runners at a good clip. You'd think even corpseball would be able to take some of those hanging pitches deep.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 09:00 PM) What happened to Mack? Hurt himself on a double.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
Brian Anderson cannot hit. Send him down, bring Terrero up.
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
This is fantastic. Since when did the White Sox field a half MLB, half AAA roster?
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
QUOTE(SoxFanForever @ Apr 25, 2007 -> 08:39 PM) Absolutely pathetic. He is throwing hangers everywhere, putting it on a tee and we waive at the low and away junkball. Corpseball comes early this year, boys!
-
White Sox vs. Tigers, 4/25/07 (L)
5 K's. That is pathetic.