Jump to content

StrangeSox

Members
  • Posts

    38,117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by StrangeSox

  1. QUOTE (ptatc @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:36 AM) All of stems from the way Coach K treated HIM at Duke. HE absolutely has hated college coaches since then. HE believes they all have too much power and will do evil things with it. HE was taking shots at NU for hiring Collins because Collins picked Duke over NU. HE will always attack college coaches as much as possible and will not consider any other side. yeah but a lot of them do
  2. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:24 AM) Welcome to sports. Dan Bernstein appears to strongly dislike this side of sports and would like to see it exposed and, presumably, eradicated. I share that sentiment. That doesn't excuse Alford's actions or the decisions of schools to ignore past transgressions.
  3. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:24 AM) Reflexive dismissal of this just based on subject matter isn't exactly a great argument. I know, so why do you keep doing it! People have shown that Bernstein often talks about issues like this and has a personal dislike for Alford. I'd bet he'd do the same thing if Curly (former PSU AD) gets hired by some big-name program somewhere. Your argument appears to be that because Bernstein potentially profits from bringing this story to light via increased ratings, we should view him in a negative light. But that argument proves far too much, condemning anyone who works for pay at any media organization anywhere. Bob Woodward made an entire career off of Watergate. Does that mean we shouldn't trust his Watergate reporting? Or that he's somehow morally suspect there?
  4. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:22 AM) IMO, yes. He wasn't the sharpest tack in the box. Dumb and immoral. Great hire, UCLA!
  5. Bernstein can't be questioned with the weaksauce arguments you and Dick and bringing or by the excuses for Alford.
  6. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:20 AM) Honestly, he really did trust people too much. I would bet money he really did believe Pierre. He was an awful judge of character. So we'll go with "dumbest man alive." That still doesn't excuse his immoral actions to get the girl to shut up.
  7. QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 09:29 AM) Yes it was. Alford: PP, did you rape this girl? PP: No, coach! She's just lying! Alford: Are you sure? PP: Yeah, coach! Alford: Whew! I thought we had a real problem here! I'll just get the christian athlete association to tell this liar to keep her mouth shut. Steve Alford: Moral coward, or dumbest man on the planet? You decide!
  8. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:11 AM) It's not hard to be on your "high horse" against sexual abuse. Anyone who has not done abusing of a sexual nature has the right. What the f*** am I reading, here? I mean that he goes into his righteous indignation mode. I don't care and I don't think his concerns are wrong or misplaced.
  9. QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:10 AM) I'll add more - this is all just a cover up http://www.onestepcamp.org/about/board-of-directors/
  10. Yeah but "sports being used to cover up sexual assault" is kinda topical right now.
  11. f***, you're right, I bet Bernstein has covered up a bunch of sexual assaults! edit: you're finding a way to brush aside criticism of Alford and direct it to Bernstein no matter what's brought up. either he cares too much, or not enough, or he's not doing anything, or he's not doing enough with other issues, or he's making money or he's alienating his fanbase, or, scrapping all that, he's probably the real moral monster here! Heads you win, tails Bernstein has a bigger scandal than PSU and the RCC combined.
  12. LOL, yup, Bernstein is likely a scumbag because he calls out known scumbag Alford.
  13. QUOTE (iamshack @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:38 AM) Bernstein has always just been so much of an egotistical prick that he veers off what the point should be, in favor of his own personal agendas, which usually is getting the last word in in any debate. It takes away from the show and makes him unbearable at times. I don't think anyone is disagreeing there.
  14. QUOTE (iamshack @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:34 AM) That's fine...but maybe he could discuss the overarching issue a bit more...instead of just zeroing in on Alford, who he clearly has a personal issue with outside of this particular transgression. He was stuck on PSU for about a year, he's covered Stuebenville, he's discussed the crap at ND, and now he's discussing Alford because he's in the news. Yeah, it's an excuse for him to break out his hobby-horse, but that doesn't mean it's illegitimate. He's not running some esoteric show on NPR that's going to invite on a bunch of sociologists to discuss the issue, so he's going to use the current hot topic to rant about. Like agreed earlier, it seems like he has something personal with Alford, but this fits a common theme.
  15. I guess you two can reject the entire idea of awareness of an issue being important, have fun!
  16. QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:28 AM) How much time did Bernstein spend on Ray Lewis? I dunno, he was pretty negative on him pre-SB this year. Not sure what that has to do with whether or not using a media outlet to promote or raise awareness of something counts as "doing something," though.
  17. QUOTE (iamshack @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:26 AM) I'm certainly not trying to minimize what Alford did, but don't you think Bernstein is being a bit overdramatic? This kind of s*** goes on constantly with big time college and pro sports and male athletes. All one needs to do is see how glorified high-profile male athletes are in our culture and how they are allowed to literally get away with murder to understand that this incident is a mere blip on the radar of transgressions committed probably almost daily. To act as though what Alford did is somehow unique or unheard of, given the energy Bernstein has devoted to this, certainly makes it seem as though he has another agenda in mind here. Bernstein is always overdramatic, that's his thing. But it seems like this is a consistent issue for him, the abuse of power in the sports world to cover up incidents like this.
  18. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:22 AM) So outside of talking about Steve Alford, what is he doing to actually fight sexual assault? Is he donating to organizations? Is he volunteering at battered women's shelters? Talking about a news story isn't nearly equal to actually fighting something. Using a large media platform to bring up the issue again and again (Penn State, Stuebenville, Alford) is "doing something"
  19. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:01 AM) Except he isn't really fighting sexual assault. He is trying to make money off of it. As is every media outlet that ever reports on anything ever. Which is it, is Bernstein ranting for hours about some dumb topic largely irrelevant to the Chicago media base he serves, or is he making $$$ off of bringing this issue up?
  20. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 09:59 AM) can't hate on someone for fighting against sexual assualt, but I do find it a bit weird the way Bernstein keeps going on & on about Alford & the PSU stuff. But hey, he's the one getting paid six figures to talk on the radio for 5 hours, so he can do what he wants. Bernstein gets on his high-horse whenever this side of sports (abuse, sexual or otherwise, that gets covered up) rears its head.
  21. Bernstein is dragging Alford's name through the mud because Alford did a pretty s***ty thing in the past. Bernstein doesn't think that thing should just be forgotten. It fits right in with the rest of his common views, concerns and actions, and maybe coming right on the heels of the Stuebenville case, provides that much more relevance.
  22. More importantly, why is the only AMC show you watch the mediocre Walking Dead and not the one-of-the-best-shows-ever Breaking Bad? edit: at least through xbox, they've been offering "season pass" options for TV shows. I know Archer was one, and WD might have been another. $25/season, which is a little steep imo, but the model's out there.
  23. What other side do you think should be represented? The pro-coverup side?
  24. The providers aren't going to go for that, though. If you're carrying Viacom, I'd imagine that they will only agree to an all-or-nothing basket for their channels.
×
×
  • Create New...