QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jul 27, 2012 -> 11:15 AM)
They've been much less successful in the playoffs than the Rays, Phillies, Cardinals, Red Sox or Rangers.
It's like saying Manchester United is the best football club...once you start having this debate, they have five milllion advantages that make comparing them to other teams kind of a pointless intellectual exercise.
It's like those same debates about how Phil Jackson would have done away from the Lakers and Bulls, with a rebuilding or "average" NBA team.
Billy Beane as GM of the Yankees, or Terry Ryan, or Andrew Friedman.
Cashman running, let's say, the Padres.
United have an enormous handicap, in the form of almost £500m of debt. Most years more money is spent on paying interest on the debt than signing players, never mind paying it off. Even ignoring the debt for the last 7 years, since 1992 United have only spent 4th most in the league and won 12 titles to the next best 3. United's two biggest rivals for next year, Man City and Chelsea have spent £382m and £215m net in the last 5 years compared to United's £34m, and both currently pay significantly more in wages too. United create a lot of money but it's a bit pointless as it's being wasted on a debt which exists entirely for the dubious privilege of having the Glazers as owners.