Please don't tell me people are going to start changing their opinions on potential trade packages solely based on Law's rankings...

 

 

Oh no definitely not. People on this site have treated Mitch Keller like some throw in though when he'd probably be the headliner. That's the point. If the Pirates were offering Keller, Glasnow and Newman, I think the Sox would have already accepted that.

Please don't tell me people are going to start changing their opinions on potential trade packages solely based on Law's rankings...

 

People always anchor to things like this, BA100, etc. To some extent it's all we have to go on.

Oh no definitely not. People on this site have treated Mitch Keller like some throw in though when he'd probably be the headliner. That's the point. If the Pirates were offering Keller, Glasnow and Newman, I think the Sox would have already accepted that.

Good. I thought I remembered you asking for more than just those 3 guys a few weeks ago and was hoping that Law's list wouldn't sway your opinion that much.

Good. I thought I remembered you asking for more than just those 3 guys a few weeks ago and was hoping that Law's list wouldn't sway your opinion that much.

 

 

I've said in the past that I didn't think Pirates could get a Quintana deal without Meadows or Bell. With that being said, if they offered Glasnow, Keller, Newman, and another piece, that'd be pretty tough to turn down.

If that's the case, then he should definitely pass. Newman is not an acceptable second piece unless Meadows is the headliner.

 

Would you take just Meadows and Newman and maybe a lesser pitcher.

 

I think I would, need some hitting prospects.

Would you take just Meadows and Newman and maybe a lesser pitcher.

 

I think I would, need some hitting prospects.

Probably, as long as the pitching prospect was halfway decent.