October 20, 200322 yr I had heard they released him. They had to get DeVannon playtime. I wouldn't mind the guy, but I wouldn't start him out of the gate, unless he has an awesome spring training.
October 20, 200322 yr Author I had heard they released him. They had to get DeVannon playtime. I wouldn't mind the guy, but I wouldn't start him out of the gate, unless he has an awesome spring training. Well I mean he's definatly an upgrade over Brian Daubach, but would he be worth it?
October 20, 200322 yr Author i dont think the sox need him. he's another slow guy who hits pop ups Well I think he would be better than Daubach.
October 20, 200322 yr I see Fullmer a copy of PK, but hitting LH. But if i would have to choose, i choose Fullmer.
October 20, 200322 yr I see Fullmer a copy of PK, but hitting LH. But if i would have to choose, i choose Fullmer. Only difference is Kong has had a great season. I would still take Fullmer because of salary reasons.
October 20, 200322 yr Only difference is Kong has had a great season. I would still take Fullmer because of salary reasons. The year Fullmer had in 2000 was comparable if not better than Konerko's in 2002. Look at the numbers, he had over 30 HR and 100 RBI in 2000.
October 20, 200322 yr How good is Fullmer defensively at first base? If we have both Konerko and Thomas still their is no point in having Fullmer on our team. If Thomas was gone though, it might not be a bad idea to have Fullmer play 1st base with Konerko DHing. Fullmer seems like a pretty agressive in nature in person and may try to prove that Anaheim was wrong for dropping him. That could result in some good numbers.
October 20, 200322 yr The year Fullmer had in 2000 was comparable if not better than Konerko's in 2002. Look at the numbers, he had over 30 HR and 100 RBI in 2000. 2000 was a long time ago, I still like him because of money reasons though.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.