winninguglyin83 Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 story from today's Times about the Mets' latest pitching sensation. And it ain't Timo Perez. The link: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/15/sports/b...all/15mets.html The story: JENKINS Published: June 15, 2004 att Ginter strums a banjo on the Mets' team plane, watches hunting DVD's in the clubhouse and prepares for a start by thumbing through catalogs advertising the latest in Buck knives. In Kansas City last weekend, he took the Mets' strength coaches to the rodeo one night. The next morning, he took a fellow pitcher to a hunting and fishing warehouse. Now that the Mets have returned to New York, Ginter excitedly awaits the arrival of his bow and arrows, which he spends much of the off-season shooting on his farm in Winchester, Ky., a town of about 16,000 located in the hills near Lexington. Advertisement It is difficult to say where exactly Ginter is going to shoot the arrows this summer, since he is living in a hotel in Queens. Ginter has taken the subway a few times since moving to New York, but he has repeatedly wound up traveling in the wrong direction. "I'm just learning how this city life works," he said. Ginter has provided the Mets a little comfort in what appears to be their roughest patch of the season. Playing his own version of country hardball, Ginter has become the surprise of a starting rotation that is itself the surprise of the major leagues. For all that has gone wrong for the Mets recently - namely, hitting and defense - their pitchers lead the majors in earned run average (3.61), and Ginter (2.43) has allowed only three runs in his past 22 2/3 innings. Ginter has joined the veteran starters Al Leiter, Tom Glavine and Steve Trachsel, even though he is really nothing like them. Leiter is a 38-year-old from New Jersey who seems just as comfortable in a suit as in a uniform. Glavine is a 38-year-old two-time Cy Young Award winner from near Boston who would have played hockey if it were not for baseball. And Trachsel, 33, is a wine connoisseur from Southern California who has never fired a gun. Yet, on the first day that Ginter asked teammates if it was all right to play a hunting video in the clubhouse, Trachsel sidled up next to him. He also tags along when Ginter goes shopping for hunting supplies or camouflage. "You get him talking about that stuff," Trachsel said, "and he'll go on forever." Relief pitcher Dan Wheeler said of Ginter: "I hear him sometimes and I'm like, 'Ohh-kay.' I can't begin to understand what he's saying." With Ginter's arrival, the Mets' pitching coach, Rick Peterson, has developed an interest in archery. Ginter has been hunting deer with his bow and arrows since he was 15, and he has developed such keen marksmanship that he can split a deck of cards with an arrow. Ginter told Peterson that when shooting an arrow, he always focuses on a spot no larger than a nickel. But when throwing a baseball, he aims at a much larger target. Ever since, Peterson has instructed Ginter to treat the mound like his farm and the baseball like his arrows, aiming at a small circle. Whether a coincidence or a consequence, Ginter's control has been uncanny, with 7 walks, 15 strikeouts and 30 hits in 33 1/3 innings. "That was my whole problem," he said. "I was focusing on a spot way too big. Now I'm narrowing my focus. I'm making my target just as small as I do with my bows." Ginter's road to Shea Stadium can sound like a self-written country song. He went into spring training as a relief pitcher for the White Sox, then was traded to the Mets for Timo Perez and converted into a starter. When he was called up from Class AAA Norfolk last month for a spot start, his luggage was lost on the way to Houston and he found himself facing Roger Clemens. Unfazed, Ginter managed the first hit of the game off Clemens, and the Mets beat the Astros in extra innings. In five of his six starts, Ginter has allowed two runs or fewer. But he has only one decision, a victory that resulted from his worst outing. In recent months, General Manager Jim Duquette has made a handful of low-profile moves that yielded high-end results; Ginter could be the most lopsided acquisition of all. He is making an impact on the Mets, who view him with amusement and delight. Closer Braden Looper calls Ginter "our country boy," and compares him to the Clampetts, the family from "The Beverly Hillbillies." Catcher Vance Wilson calls him "our redneck," but he insists he is using the term endearingly. When reliever David Weathers wants instant entertainment, he summons Ginter to review an episode of "Hee-Haw." "Me and him understand each other," said Weathers, who is from Tennessee. "When one of us is talking, we don't have to say, 'Huh?' " As Ginter looks around the clubhouse at Kazuo Matsui of Japan, Jae Seo of South Korea, Karim Garcia from Mexico and Cliff Floyd of Chicago, he is struck by how many races and nationalities are represented on a baseball team. "It's the great thing about this game," Ginter said. "You meet people from everywhere. You get to see the whole world." Ginter is more than willing to share a piece of the bluegrass where he was raised. His banjo case, adorned with a John Deere sticker, is already a clubhouse fixture. On the way home from a trip, Ginter takes song requests from teammates. Sometimes, they want to hear something by Cripple Creek, sometimes Lynyrd Skynyrd. But Ginter often ends with the tunes that remind him of his Kentucky home. "I do miss it," he said. "But I try to take some of it with me wherever I go. I'll listen to my bluegrass, no matter what anyone says. I won't change just because I'm in the big leagues now." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 You win some; you lose some. I'm not sure Ginter would have succeeded here. Maybe he learned a new pitch with the NYM. You can see firsthand how Loaiza and Scho step up after adding a new pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wise Master Buehrle Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Good for Matt Ginter. It was good that he got a change of scenery. I tell you what, the Mets have a great pitching coach. Unfortunately, Matt wasn't destined for anything here, so there's no point in believing he would have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 The only thing I don't understand about Ginter is this - his first full year in Birmingham he was lights out as a starter, he did really well. Then, for some reason they converted him to a reliever, where he struggled. Maybe it's just a case of this guy maturing. He always had a good arm, and sometimes it takes a change of scenery to make things click. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 The only thing I don't understand about Ginter is this - his first full year in Birmingham he was lights out as a starter, he did really well. Then, for some reason they converted him to a reliever, where he struggled. Maybe it's just a case of this guy maturing. He always had a good arm, and sometimes it takes a change of scenery to make things click. Jerry Manual had a certain effect on players... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnB Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Good for matt, chicago wasn't the place for him right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 I am almost always happy when ex-Sox players switch to the NL and have nice careers. Almost :sosasucks :sosasucks :fthecubs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winninguglyin83 Posted June 15, 2004 Author Share Posted June 15, 2004 I'm happy for Ginter, but I'd be happier if he was pitching at 35th and Dan Ryan. Never wise to give away a good arm. Never. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Unfortunately, Matt wasn't destined for anything here, so there's no point in believing he would have. tend to agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 The only thing I don't understand about Ginter is this - his first full year in Birmingham he was lights out as a starter, he did really well. Then, for some reason they converted him to a reliever, where he struggled. Maybe it's just a case of this guy maturing. He always had a good arm, and sometimes it takes a change of scenery to make things click. I was thinking the same thing earlier this week. But After I thought about it for a little bit, it seemed to make more sense. Take a look. Reason #1) Mark Buehrle --In 2000 He was lights out at B'ham also. Got the call-up, was light out from the pen. Moved to the rotation. Lights out again. Reason #2) Jon Garland -- Lights out in AAA, gets called up. He was the youngest pitcher in the majors that year. Reason #3) Kip Wells -- When he was called up in 99, he was dominant over those few starts. He was up and down in 2000, at times dominant, othertimes wild and supremely hittable. Reason #4) Jon Rauch -- I have him at #4, but really he is reason #1 why Ginter ended up in the pen. In 2000 Rauch projected to be a top of the rotation guy, who would likely make his Chicago debut in 2001. -- MB is the only guy listed so far who, in 2000, didn't project to be a front-of-the-rotation-type guy. Reason #5) The 2000 starting rotation. Baldwin, Parque, and Sirotka were all due back, and looked like a solid base to the rotation for years to come. Parque was only 24, and was property of the sox for plenty more years. Reason #6) Hoover Met is a Pitchers park. Ginters 2000 numbers at AA should be adjusted. Sadly every year, we see some prospect put up great numbers at the Met, and think he is the next coming. Its the ballpark more often than not though. http://espn.go.com/mlb/columns/bp/789556.html This article points to how many thought the sox were on the cusp of greatness in 2000. Sadly that wasn't the case. Simply put, in 2000, the sox had the best stockpile of young arms in baseball. They had the luxury of turning a #1 pick into a reliever becasue they had plenty of other arms in the rotation who already projected better than Ginter. --------------------------------- I'm happy that a change of scenery seems to have done Matt some good, and wish him the best in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 The one trade that really killed us is the Ritchie trade. We all knew it was horrible and we gave up so many good young guys for someone who was terrible. At least the David Wells trade on paper was an improvement. The Ritchie trade was just bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winninguglyin83 Posted June 15, 2004 Author Share Posted June 15, 2004 Amen. although, Sean Lowe disappeared quickly. Fogg is nothing special. We hit the panic button of instant gratification on Kip Wells. Isn't Todd Ritchie trying to make it back with the Twinkies? Maybe he can still help the White Sox!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 although, Sean Lowe disappeared quickly. True. He was always made out to be a starter, but never got the chance. Fogg is nothing special. Not yet, he's sort of like a young Kip Wells. We hit the panic button of instant gratification on Kip Wells. Yup. I remember he was frustrating to watch, but at least he had done something before. Garland had never really done anything at that point. Isn't Todd Ritchie trying to make it back with the Twinkies? Maybe he can still help the White Sox!!!!!!!!!! ? We'll see about that. We can only hope they have a spot for him as a starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.