Jump to content

Moneyball (not the book)


YASNY
 Share

Recommended Posts

I found the following at the end of a column that talks about small market owners being fed up. Jim Bowdon has proposed setting financial division vs geographical ones.

 

Moneyball

 

If Major League Baseball realigned franchises based strictly on payroll, here's what the divisions would have looked like last season, with their 2004 won-lost records:

 

TIFFANY

 

2004 Payroll W-L

 

Yankees $182,835,513 101-61

 

Boston $125,208,542 98-64

 

Anaheim $101,084,667 92-70

 

Mets $100,629,303 71-91

 

Philadelphia $93,219,167 86-76

 

ROLEX

 

Chi. (NL) $91,101,667 89-73

 

Los Angeles $89,694,342 93-69

 

Atlanta $88,507,788 96-66

 

San Francisco $82,019,167 91-71

 

Seattle $81,543,833 63-90

 

PRICE CLUB

 

St. Louis $75,633,517 105-57

 

Houston $74,666,303 92-70

 

Arizona $70,204,984 51-111

 

Chi. (AL) $65,212,500 83-79

 

Colorado $64,590,403 68-94

 

DOLLAR STORE

 

Oakland $59,825,167 91-71

 

Texas $54,825,973 89-73

 

San Diego $54,639,503 87-75

 

Minnesota $53,585,000 92-70

 

Baltimore $51,212,653 78-84

 

FIVE & DIME

 

Toronto $50,017,000 67-94

 

Kansas City $47,609,000 58-104

 

Detroit $46,353,554 72-90

 

Montreal $43,197,500 67-95

 

Cincinnati $43,067,858 76-86

 

THRIFT SHOP

 

Florida $42,118,042 84-79

 

Cleveland $34,569,300 80-82

 

Pittsburgh $32,227,929 72-89

 

Tampa Bay $29,506,667 70-91

 

Milwaukee $27,518,500 67-94

 

NOTE: The payrolls listed are for the Opening Day rosters based on figures obtained by The Associated Press, including salaries and prorated shares of signing bonuses. In some cases, parts of salaries deferred without interest are discounted to reflect present-day values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is some merit in what he's saying but he's not saying it right.

MLB would benefit greatly if it took a page out of the NFL's sched formula.

Next yr's schedule is based on your W total from previous years.

Weaker teams get weaker schedules.

 

x-Anaheim 92

San Francisco 91

Oakland 91

Chicago Cubs 89

Texas 89

San Diego 87

Philadelphia 86

Florida 83

Chicago Sox 83

Cleveland 80

Baltimore 78

Cincinnati 76

Pittsburgh 72

Detroit 72

NY Mets 71

Tampa Bay 70

Colorado 68

Milwaukee 67

Toronto 67

Montreal 67

Seattle 63

Kansas City 58

Arizona 51

 

With a 162 gm schedule you have to be creative. Weak teams need NY & BOS to help at the gate. So you manipulate the home & away games between the strong & the weak.

 

KC had 6 vs NY, 6 vs BOS, 19 vs MIN, 7 vs ANA, 9 vs OAK, & 9 vs TEX in 04. Those were split mostly even betw H & R.

 

In 05 they should have home field adv against all those teams.

Likewise the 9 gm series should be against the weaker teams.

 

This is an idea the MLBPA should strongly consider in the 07 CBA. The best way to provide revenue sharing is to shift the gate to the weaker teams. If that means some teams don't play others so be it. KC will reap much more revenue if it can play 12 gms vs NY & BOS at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention IL play the same strategy should follow suit there as well.

When weak teams have to play strong teams they should do so at home.

The schedule should be flexible enough in both league & IL play so that the weaker teams have the weakest possible schedule w/out sacrificing the gate

from the stronger teams.

 

If the MLBPA could get on board with this then I think the majority of owners would approve. I'd even go so far as to say if it means trams like BOS & NY have less than 81 home games so be it. They are only 2 out of 30 teams. They get 2 no votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...