May 24, 200520 yr Daniels said he found "no grounds to second guess years of court rulings or to reject the recommendation of the parole board." What an asshole.
May 24, 200520 yr Why not do this? (By this I mean let him donate part of his liver.) Edited May 24, 200520 yr by Queen Prawn
May 24, 200520 yr Hell once the liver is harvested roll him over for execution...who cares if he hasn't recovered, they are going to kill him anyway...
May 24, 200520 yr Did you guys read the part about her doctors advising against him donating?.....saying she'd be better suited to go the conventional route and waiting for a complete liver.
May 24, 200520 yr QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ May 24, 2005 -> 02:17 PM) Did you guys read the part about her doctors advising against him donating?.....saying she'd be better suited to go the conventional route and waiting for a complete liver. Standard advice in any organ donation. My grandmother needed a kidney.. her doctors gave us all the same song and dance. My aunt was a match.. my grama got her kidney.
May 24, 200520 yr QUOTE(Steff @ May 24, 2005 -> 07:19 PM) Standard advice in any organ donation. My grandmother needed a kidney.. her doctors gave us all the same song and dance. My aunt was a match.. my grama got her kidney. All I'm saying is, it gave the judge all he needed.
May 24, 200520 yr QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ May 24, 2005 -> 02:27 PM) All I'm saying is, it gave the judge all he needed. No it didn't.. The judge didn't even use that as his excuse for denial. "Daniels said he found "no grounds to second guess years of court rulings or to reject the recommendation of the parole board."
May 24, 200520 yr QUOTE(Steff @ May 24, 2005 -> 07:33 PM) No it didn't.. The judge didn't even use that as his excuse for denial. "Daniels said he found "no grounds to second guess years of court rulings or to reject the recommendation of the parole board." I understand that's what he said on the record. From the way the article reads to me, it sounds like someone questioned him about it and that's when he explains it. I agree with you, but I also see how the judge is spinning it.
May 24, 200520 yr Judge..?? What judge..? And I'm not going to assume anything other than what I read.. and what I read is that the Gov doesn't think that possibily saving the life of an innocent person is "grounds" to give him a stay. As I said... asshole.
May 24, 200520 yr QUOTE(Steff @ May 24, 2005 -> 07:41 PM) Judge..?? What judge..? Judge Wapner......just kidding, I meant Gov.
May 24, 200520 yr QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ May 24, 2005 -> 02:45 PM) Judge Wapner......just kidding, I meant Gov.
May 24, 200520 yr surprised the ACLU isn't fighting this, 'cause it could be considered two death sentences... or three if you count the 82 year old lady this guy stomped on...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.