July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 01:56 AM) That's the one I was f***ing looking for. I always forget the damn symbols. Anyway yes I am totally jealous of your awesome Photoshop skillz. Perhaps you can teach me. :puke
July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 02:14 AM) That's the one I was f***ing looking for. I always forget the damn symbols. Anyway yes I am totally jealous of your awesome Photoshop skillz. Perhaps you can teach me. :puke But remember you taught him - with the help of wite. Damn I piss patterns in the snow better than that thing. Should that been green or not? Edited July 21, 200520 yr by WHarris1
July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 03:14 AM) Anyway yes I am totally jealous of your awesome Photoshop skillz. Perhaps you can teach me. :puke Shouldn't that be in green?
July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(knightni @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 02:33 AM) Shouldn't that be in green? Obvious sarcasm does not require green.
July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 05:00 PM) Is it that f***ing bad? Damn you guys are assholes. It's a good attempt considering how long you've been doing these. Your cut outs arew realy good. The text needs work and the overall image is too busy. Calm down the background.
July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(Spiff @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 04:26 PM) It's not that bad, it's just a little busy. and Garland looks like lurch or something
July 21, 200520 yr Author Any recommendation on how I could improve it??? I'm going to make it less busy and lower the # of people in it.
July 21, 200520 yr Author Less busy, text snads out more, glowing Crede... Better? Needs something more???
July 21, 200520 yr Author Lesser checkerboard opacity, MB centered more.... Better? STILL more work???
July 21, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(knightni @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 04:10 PM) Crede glowing? bleah. That checkerboard needs to go altogether. When you look at it in FULL resolution (1024x768), the checkerboard, which is a 8x8 pattern I created, is very light and not very visible.
July 21, 200520 yr You did way too much with the text, less is more. You added an outer bevel to everyone and it looks quite bad. Reduce the amount of s*** you do to the text and ditch the checkerboard it looks cheap.
July 21, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 04:15 PM) You did way too much with the text, less is more. You added an outer bevel to everyone and it looks quite bad. Reduce the amount of s*** you do to the text and ditch the checkerboard it looks cheap. I only added the bebel in the text....
July 21, 200520 yr QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 03:16 PM) I only added the bebel in the text.... Well all I was talking about was the text so "ever one" would be refering to the text. s*** choice of words.
July 21, 200520 yr A lot of times, "less is more". Glowing and beveling can go overboard. Try dropping shadows more and beveling and glowing less.
July 21, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 21, 2005 -> 04:17 PM) Well all I was talking about was the text so "ever one" would be refering to the text. s*** choice of words. Gotcha... Lesser bevel, VERY little glow, lesser is morer? Edited July 21, 200520 yr by SoxFan1
July 21, 200520 yr Author Darker background, no checkers, no red stroke, drop shadows... Anything else???
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.