September 30, 200520 yr These were the choices...disappointed?!?....what a bunch of f***wipes! I know I should consider the source...but just pissed me off. The Sox win the Central. How are you feeling? Pumped up Relieved Disappointed
September 30, 200520 yr the sun times isn't any better with mariotti's daily flip flops in opinions. i used to get the sun times delivered, but had to cancel it last week when mariotti's writing hit an all time low when he bashed hawk for sounding like a pig after crede's hr. Edited September 30, 200520 yr by White Sox
September 30, 200520 yr QUOTE(White Sox @ Sep 30, 2005 -> 12:59 AM) the sun times isn't any better with mariotti's daily flip flops in opinions. WRONG. The Sun-Times is actually worse with White Sox coverage, despite their rival owning the White Sox' rival team.
September 30, 200520 yr the sun times isn't any better with mariotti's daily flip flops in opinions. i used to get the sun times delivered, but had to cancel it last week when mariotti's writing hit an all time low when he bashed hawk for sounding like a pig after crede's hr. Today's Mariotti column already was trying to do a slow backtrack. Should be interesting now how the papers play it. Generally when a city's team makes the playoffs, wins the division, etc., it catches the attention of the "newsside" people who want to celebrate and rightly so. They come up with catchy headlines and stories that actually support the team. Well ... contrast those types of stories that we're about to see with Mariotti's rants. Remember just yesterday he was blasting the Sox and saying even if we "somehow" back in what fun will it be to get swept? I wonder if he'll praise us now???? GO SOX.
September 30, 200520 yr Please, if the shoe was on the other foot what option would you choose for the Cubs making the playoff and not the Sox. . .
September 30, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ Sep 29, 2005 -> 09:38 PM) Please, if the shoe was on the other foot what option would you choose for the Cubs making the playoff and not the Sox. . . What option would I choose?!?....how bout the "I couldn't give a s*** less!" option.
September 30, 200520 yr I agree Moronotti makes the Sun-Times many times worse than Cubune. How many times did Moronotti write about the CWS after a win? How many times after a loss? It seemed like he was taking delight in the loses of late. The Times should fire his butt. There are many more objective & interesting sports reporters out there.
September 30, 200520 yr Sorry, but the Tribune sucks. They have a couple of good sports writers, but the Sun-Times blows them away, even if you don't like Mariotti. Try and have a little perspective here guys. BTW Wrigley Field's scoreboard said last night: "CONGRATULATIONS CHICAGO WHITE SOX: 2005 CENTRAL DIVISION CHAMPIONS". Classy.
September 30, 200520 yr QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ Sep 30, 2005 -> 07:48 AM) Sorry, but the Tribune sucks. They have a couple of good sports writers, but the Sun-Times blows them away, even if you don't like Mariotti. Try and have a little perspective here guys. BTW Wrigley Field's scoreboard said last night: "CONGRATULATIONS CHICAGO WHITE SOX: 2005 CENTRAL DIVISION CHAMPIONS". Classy. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> hopefully you took a couple of pics of that???
September 30, 200520 yr QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ Sep 29, 2005 -> 10:38 PM) Please, if the shoe was on the other foot what option would you choose for the Cubs making the playoff and not the Sox. . . Rally Chomsky. That's some funny stuff.
September 30, 200520 yr QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ Sep 30, 2005 -> 09:48 AM) Sorry, but the Tribune sucks. They have a couple of good sports writers, but the Sun-Times blows them away, even if you don't like Mariotti. Try and have a little perspective here guys. BTW Wrigley Field's scoreboard said last night: "CONGRATULATIONS CHICAGO WHITE SOX: 2005 CENTRAL DIVISION CHAMPIONS". Classy.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.