August 27, 200817 yr Author QUOTE (knightni @ Aug 25, 2008 -> 12:15 AM) 1 AB, 1 K. Same old Pablo. Still the f***ing man!
August 27, 200817 yr QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Aug 27, 2008 -> 06:02 PM) Ozuna has been cut by the Dodgers.... Bring him back for Sept 1.
August 28, 200817 yr Thats rough, getting cut 4 days before the rosters expand to 40...although I'm sure they did it with the playoff roster in mind
August 28, 200817 yr QUOTE (WilliamTell @ Aug 28, 2008 -> 10:08 AM) I could see him coming back to the Sox, but we've been fine without him. With a 40 man roster, he could help.
August 28, 200817 yr QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Aug 28, 2008 -> 10:54 AM) Thats rough, getting cut 4 days before the rosters expand to 40...although I'm sure they did it with the playoff roster in mind Which is odd, because if they left him on until Sept 1 they would have a free 25 man playoff spot to use on whoever they wanted after they released him. Surprised they didnt take advantage of that loop hole
August 28, 200817 yr Why would we want him? With the Sox in regular season play, he was 23/15 in SB/CS. He sucks.
August 29, 200817 yr 10 Reasons We Should Bring Back Pablo (1) He could be the 2008 version of Geoff Blum. (2) Because he could come in handy when we face CC in the World Series (3) Would provide us with depth when Crede goes back on the DL before the end of the season (4) - (10) Others??? Edited August 29, 200817 yr by scenario
August 29, 200817 yr You can scratch off 1-2 becuase the idea would be to bring him on when the rosters expand which makes him ineligible for the playoffs. I'd rather see Crede with a cane at third than Pablo. He was brutal there.
August 29, 200817 yr QUOTE (santo=dorf @ Aug 28, 2008 -> 06:41 PM) You can scratch off 1-2 becuase the idea would be to bring him on when the rosters expand which makes him ineligible for the playoffs. I'd rather see Crede with a cane at third than Pablo. He was brutal there. I'm pretty sure he could still be made eligible just before the playoffs if the situation justified it. And I'm not really suggesting we should re-sign him. Just thought the reasons why people think we 'should' would make an interesting (and possibly funny) list. Edited August 29, 200817 yr by scenario
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.