I don't need evidence, Dick.

 

All I stated was that one cannot use our rumored interest in Soler as evidence that we have money to spend on player acquisitions for this year.

 

That does not require evidence.

As I said either Gammons or KW was lying. Maybe you have evidence the Sox didn't make Soler the offer Gammons claimed. If the Sox had money for Soler, they have money to pick someone up. They only have to pay them for half a season. Soler would require some sort of bonus and salary this season, so your future payroll argument is moot.

You have a very low threshold of proof, my friend.

 

Yeah I dont trust those sports writers like Peter Gammons who has been doing this for most of his life and has sources all around Major League Baseball.

Apparently you are drunk.

 

Not at all. I always reread my posts before I post them. Maybe something you should try to do from now on.

As I said either Gammons or KW was lying. Maybe you have evidence the Sox didn't make Soler the offer Gammons claimed. If the Sox had money for Soler, they have money to pick someone up. They only have to pay them for half a season. Soler would require some sort of bonus and salary this season, so your future payroll argument is moot.

You're making an affirmative statement which requires an assumption to be made if it is to be considered valid.

 

I'm pointing out that there is no information available to us today which allows us to make that assumption, and thus, your affirmative statement is invalid.

 

Do you understand the distinction?

Every watched Pulp Fiction? I guess not.

 

Im typing in perfect English. If you cant read thats not my fault.

This is what he does when he is out of bullets. I think he's starting to realize his ridiculousness.

Yeah I dont trust those sports writers like Peter Gammons who has been doing this for most of his life and has sources all around Major League Baseball.

Me neither.

This is what he does when he is out of bullets. I think he's starting to realize his ridiculousness.

No, it's what I do when I realize the audience I am debating with is incapable of understanding the argument I am making.

You're making an affirmative statement which requires an assumption to be made if it is to be considered valid.

 

I'm pointing out that there is no information available to us today which allows us to make that assumption, and thus, your affirmative statement is invalid.

 

Do you understand the distinction?

What affirmative statement. I mentioned Gammons report. I said one of them is lying. I didn't say which one. I did say if Gammons was accurate, KW's crying poor is, once again, BS like it was before Peavy, Rios, Jackson and Ramirez, and for that matter Dunn, Konerko and AJP. The word IF is big there.

Edited June 22, 201213 yr by Dick Allen

Me neither.

 

Ill give Kenny a call and ask him.

What affirmative statement. I mentioned Gammons report. I said one of them is lying. I didn't say which one. I did say if Gammons was accurate, KW's crying poor is, once again, BS like it was before Peavy, Rios, Jackson and Ramirez, and for that matter Dunn, Konerko and AJP.

That the White Sox have money to spend right now.

Ill give Kenny a call and ask him.

Well if I had known you had his number this whole time I would have asked you to call him a long time ago!

No, it's what I do when I realize the audience I am debating with is incapable of understanding the argument I am making.

Because there is no audience on the planet capable of understanding your argument.

What affirmative statement. I mentioned Gammons report. I said one of them is lying. I didn't say which one. I did say if Gammons was accurate, KW's crying poor is, once again, BS like it was before Peavy, Rios, Jackson and Ramirez, and for that matter Dunn, Konerko and AJP.

 

I have no idea why anyone would listen to Kenny crying poor. I remember this right before we acquired Peavy. I bet he was laughing his *** off that night.

Because there is no audience on the planet capable of understanding your argument.

That's honestly the best you can do? Because I can keep lighting you both up all night long...

Well if I had known you had his number this whole time I would have asked you to call him a long time ago!

 

You understand real life better than me though. Maybe you should try to give Kenny a lesson since your so knowledgeable.

You understand real life better than me though. Maybe you should try to give Kenny a lesson since your so knowledgeable.

No, I am the Kenny supporter...DA will remind you of that when you sober up.

No, I am the Kenny supporter...DA will remind you of that when you sober up.

 

I havent had a drink in my life actually.

That the White Sox have money to spend right now.

Learn how to read. Here's my original post you started arguing.

 

 

Isn't it a little strange KW rmentioned the attendance perhaps hurting his ability to add to the current roster only days after Peter Gammons reported the Sox offered Soler $25-30 million? Either Gammons is lying or KW is lying about being strapped for cash.

 

I really have no idea how it got you so riled up, but its hard to argue it isn't accurate.

Edited June 22, 201213 yr by Dick Allen

Learn how to read. Here's my original post you started arguing.

 

 

Isn't it a little strange KW rmentioned the attendance perhaps hurting his ability to add to the current roster only days after Peter Gammons reported the Sox offered Soler $25-30 million? Either Gammons is lying or KW is lying about being strapped for cash.

Throughout the thread you've stated several times, in perhaps every way possible, that the White Sox have money to spend right now.

 

Are you honestly trying to amend that now to be a conditional statement?

I havent had a drink in my life actually.

By George, I think we have found the elusive solution to your chronic uptightness...

Throughout the thread you've stated several times, in perhaps every way possible, that the White Sox have money to spend right now.

 

Are you honestly trying to amend that now to be a conditional statement?

 

That was his original post.

That's honestly the best you can do? Because I can keep lighting you both up all night long...

Yeah, you're really lighting me up. Grow up.

By George, I think we have found the elusive solution to your chronic uptightness...

 

I have a very low tolerance for stupid bull****.

Throughout the thread you've stated several times, in perhaps every way possible, that the White Sox have money to spend right now.

 

Are you honestly trying to amend that now to be a conditional statement?

That was my orignal post at 8:09

That was his original post.

I stopped arguing his original post when I originally responded to it.