1. So what of same-day registrations? And once you register, presumably at an earlier date, if you don't show any ID to prove who you are when you get there, you can say just any name that happens to be on the rolls.

 

2. Do you have proof that is what they do or are you just guessing? I would venture you are just guessing.

I've used same day registration. Wanna throw my vote out?

 

You still have to be able to show proof of residence. It's not like anyone can just walk in.

Explain to me how these people function in today's society then. They can't work without a ss card and an ID, you need tp provide that with your job application and the I9 form. They can't get government benefits if they don't work since the government has no clue who they are. They can't cash checks without an ID, even at a currency exchange.

This has been explained multiple times in the past. Google it if you are actually interested.

 

 

This has been explained multiple times in the past. Google it if you are actually interested.

The king of "zomg where are your sources" telling someone to google something lol

I'm under no obligation to relieve your ignorance for you.

In theory photo ID should be required for voting, but in practice it can't be done without disenfranchising groups of voters.

How would you apply that requirement to states like Washington or Oregon where all voting is done by mail? How would it apply in other states where absentee voting is frequently done by mail?

I think voting should require 83 forms of ID, a yearly subscription, and a basic competency test. Oh, and it should be taxed.

I think voting should require 83 forms of ID, a yearly subscription, and a basic competency test. Oh, and it should be taxed.

 

Don't give Rahm any ideas.

I think the basic question is should the government be working toward making voting as accessible and efficient as possible for its eligible citizens.

 

To me that answer is yes. Mobile service sucks. You have to be available during the time it's there and cannot plan on going to a set place.

 

I'd like to see the response if the government was going out of its way to make paying taxes harder what the response would be here when it's affecting you.

 

There's been so much research on behavioral economics, and it's been pretty widely accepted how the smallest deterrant can have huge effects on participation. If you believe the government should be promoting voting, it seems crazy to add more deterrants to the process.

 

This is just justifying something because you don't like the people complaining about the problem.