Jump to content

bmags

Admin
  • Posts

    60,640
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

bmags last won the day on February 12

bmags had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About bmags

  • Birthday 07/26/1986

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Oak Park, IL

Previous Fields

  • Favorite Sox Minor League Affiliate
    Arizona White Sox (Rookie)
  • Soxtalk Awards
    2006:Most MusicalPost of the Year

Recent Profile Visitors

9,661 profile views

bmags's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

12.7k

Reputation

  1. It has definitely started to become chalk now with 4 QBs in top 8. That is wild, but hard to see that happening without a WR getting to 9. But I"m sure we'll find that it's far from certain. I think it will be too hard to say no to Odunze/Nabers. But I'm good trading down just want a WR.
  2. This is the nastrini train sir
  3. Getz gonna bring him up for opening day and Grifol gonna sit him on the bench to have him learn by watching.
  4. Choo Choo this is the train to get aboard for Nastrini [x] Tremendous Stubble [x] Does not give up runs [x] Hat fits well [ ] Cy Young Will he get there?
  5. I think getting an edge now, or Byron Murphy, is totally defensible, as is getting a tackle. BUT, it sure feels like, even while expensive, that top edge talent comes available far more often than top ten receiver talent right now. Packers showed you can build a top WR corps in later rounds, but bears...have not. May be last shot at getting a well rounded bigger, faster, stronger guy to anchor the corps regardless. I'd take Odunze if he is there, but also would be ok if they traded down and took an AD Mitchell / Brian Thomas. They earned the ability to take them by not needing them year 1.
  6. Also the sheer number of notre dame fans that live in chicago where it was the only game they saw of him and how fans love to take the position of someone being "overrated"
  7. Lawrence is in no way a massive bust. He still threw for 4,000 yards. He’s a definite long term starter but they definitely suffered without Kirk. Ridley had way too many drops. Fully expect him back to 2022 self next year.
  8. I mean it was never the highlight plays. Honestly he was probably one of the better Red Zone QBs I imagine. But he just so consistently took a ten yard sack rather then finding a 5-6 yard gain and we could never get in field position. Add the fumbles to the sacks and it just destroyed the value he provided with his legs.
  9. And I say that because that is 4 different orgs. 1 was the best development situation of all time (Lance). Utter failure. Pats developed best QB of all time. Consistently drafted later round QBs and flipped them (Garoppolo was equal value, but others as well). By year three they hated him. Jets and Bears both equal strugglers. But Jets have Wilson a strong defense and a damn good skill room for wide outs. Failure. The jags have Lawrence the worst first year set up of all time. He’s a sure long time starter.
  10. I know the packers are an opposite end here but I see this and I think to myself the idea that the great QBs were “developed” is extremely overrated. Feels more like 60% luck, 30% scouting and 10% development. I think you take the risk on a fields because the arm, accuracy when set and athleticism is worth seeing if he could improve his processing and sack avoidance. It didn’t work out. And while he could have had better stats in other orgs, I’m honestly not sure the degree better, certainly not to a top 15 QB imo.
  11. To be fair given what guards went for in free agency, getting a locked in 2 year 8 mill deal for a guard you like may be worth the price. Just like if Allen was cut, no guarantee he chooses Chicago.
  12. It’s funny but these are also terrible QBs for Arthur Smith
  13. If poles price was a starter price, nobody viewed him as a starter. This is a backup price that got worse as backups with longer contracts were acquired.
×
×
  • Create New...