July 11, 20169 yr QUOTE (captain54 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 12:01 PM) Oh well, I tried.. I pointed out an inconsistency in your logic in the Robertson thread… My point earlier was that the BP #'s are skewed because of early positive numbers, you said Robertson's #'s are skewed because of negative numbers..but because my point leans more towards the negative, I'm wrong and you're right.. Difficult to have a discussion with someone who dances around the central point of debate, then manufactures the other person's POV to fit however narrative they wish to promote… So for that, I'm out . chief... There was no inconsistency. My point here was that if you are taking that one horrible outing for David Robertson and weighting it too much, you are missing the big picture. Just like when you focused only on the bad stretch for the bullpen, Matt Albers, and the one game you saw in person, you were missing the big picture on the performance of the bullpen. That was my point in both discussions, no matter what bitterness you tried to dredge up and drag into another thread, from a previous discussion. Though the irony is that in both cases, it was the worst case scenario being focused on too much.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.