jphat007 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Dec 20, 2005 -> 01:47 PM) Actually it was the middle of August (Buerhle had a 3.07 and Santana had a (3.37). Sorry technically it was a .30 difference. They were going head to head. Buerhle gave up a bunch of runs, I made a comment in the game thread that we should have an ACE like Santana and you jumped on how Buerhle was better because at the time he had more wins and a better ERA by a small margin. We had that argument before August, and .30 ERA is NOT a small difference. It's a big difference. Buerhle was better at the time. Nobody in their right mind would take Buerhle over Santana in the long run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 This has gone on way past it usefulness... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts