-
Game Thread: 4/23 vs Arizona (GM3)
This didn’t age well.
-
4/21 game thread White Sox at AZ
Yeah, good idea. It would be terrible to have an experienced outfielder and good right-handed bat in the lineup as we chase a Wildcard spot into August.
-
4/19 Sox vs [insert location] A's
“For "relievers". That's not closers. There are 20 player's with 3, or more, saves in MLB currently. Of them none have an equal, or worse, save rate than Anthony. He is dead last.” I can read and you said, “in MLB currently. . . none of them have an equal or worse rate than Anthony. He is dead last.” I can read and I understand what the word “currently” means. One thing it means is whatever you found in 2025 means nothing: it’s not under the idea of “currently”. I also understand what “none of them have” and I understand what “equal or worse rate” means. If you check that link for 2026, “currently” two pitchers have an “equal” rate. And two more “currently” have a worse rate. So, Dominguez is not “dead last”, which I am also able to read and understand. And all four of those relievers are clearly their team’s “closer”, having that many save opportunities.
-
4/19 Sox vs [insert location] A's
Again I call BS. TB and LAA have closers also with 4 saves in 6 opportunities. There 13 or so guys doing better than Dominguez, but beyond that there are very few who have had 6 or more svos. There’s a bunch of guys at 2- 0 and 3 - 0 in svos. Also a bunch at 1 - 0 or 2- 0 or 1 - 1. WSH’s guy is 2 of 4 svos. Hoffman of TOR is 2 of 5 svos. Leiter of the As is 2 of 4 svos. So Dominguez is NOT dead last. Why come on here and misrepresent something that is not at all true. Here’s the link to save stats: https://www.mlb.com/stats/pitching/saves?page=1
-
4/19 Sox vs [insert location] A's
Yes, he would be good because he would be above average as the AI said.
-
4/19 Sox vs [insert location] A's
Right off google: AI Overview As of 2025, the league-wide average save percentage for MLB relievers is approximately 63%. As usual, you’re completely full of BS!
-
4/19 Sox vs [insert location] A's
I agree with this 100%. Teel and Hays (if he can stay healthy and not be this year’s Tauchman) will help a ton, a ton. Not confident we can get last year’s Shane Smith back, but the other Smith, Hagen, will be up in a month or two. I still really think chasing a wild card spot is possible, if and only if, our bullpen gets its act together.
-
4/19 Sox vs [insert location] A's
Thank goodness they free up the money in the Robert trade to go out and get a closer! Just yanking’ your chain, Caulfield. Dominguez has been less than stellar. But really, 4 for 6 in save opportunities is far from terrible. If they had had him last year, they wouldn’t have lost, even, 95 games. Plus I was about to admit that Taylor IS their best reliever, but really he’s kinda mediocre, just like the others, including Dominguez.
-
Fire Chris Getz
You’re debating in good faith here. You know that the financial restraints put on Getz by Jerry made that impossible for Getz to do that.
-
Fire Chris Getz
YES! and he was able to then trade him for Acuna and STILL have the money to get Dominguez and acquire Hicks and Sandlin. How can you not see that as a smart move? It makes no sense to complain about picking up Robert’s option. It was such a smart move.
-
LUIS ROBERT TRADED
Or, the White could be in contention for a wild card spot and be buyers and not sellers in July. As far fetched as you might think that is, (I think it sort of is too), I still think it’s much more likely than the Sox trading Dominguez this coming July.
-
Fire Chris Getz
1st of all, so you’ve already given up on Murakami being a good signing? This early? That is saying something there. But you might be right. Plus, getting Hicks and Sandlin could turn out to be a very good move, both short term and long term. You guys don’t agree but then make these statements that you’re right and Getz is wrong like they’re absolute facts.
-
Fire Chris Getz
So if a GM makes an intelligent trade to free up some money on a player whom we have seen is injured a 1/3 of his playing time (cracks me up that proving he was out ONLY 33% of his time with the Sox was presented as evidence that Robert was a good/ dependable player, missing 33%) - trading this player for a potential high ceiling player and freeing up the money to buy a closer, the one thing the Sox most desperately needed, this smart move is evidence Getz should be fired and that Sox are a “joke” organization? Oh, okay. Now I understand and agree with your point.
-
LUIS ROBERT TRADED
Besides Acuna, who the Sox also acquired from that trade got both saves in the two wins at KC. People keep forgetting to mention that fact because it makes their complains fall apart.
-
Fire Chris Getz
Who the Sox got out the Luis Robert trade got both saves in the two wins in KC. To say the Sox only got Acuna is an example of classic card stacking propaganda: Your only present half the facts because when all facts are considered, your argument falls apart. Plus, once he learns the position, say by July, Acuna could very well be looking better than Robert on the IL. A very real possibility and Sox will still have Dominguez saving games.
vilehoopster
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited